Skip to main content

Rep. Peter King arrives on Capitol Hill, in Washington, in a May 21, 2019, file photo.

The Associated Press

Rep. Peter King, a moderate Republican who has represented a Long Island congressional district for nearly 30 years, announced Monday he won’t seek re-election, enhancing Democrats’ chances to grab yet another suburban House seat as they defend their majority in 2020.

The decision comes days after voters flocked to Democratic candidates in state elections in Kentucky and Virginia, underscoring Republican vulnerability in a suburban revolt against President Donald Trump.

But in the latest indication that congressional Republicans are rallying behind Trump for now, King said he will oppose Democratic efforts to impeach Trump. King also opposed Bill Clinton’s impeachment in 1998.

Story continues below advertisement

“In the coming weeks and during the next year I intend to vote against President Trump’s impeachment and will support the President’s bid for re-election,” King said.

The 14-term congressman, 75, said in a Facebook post that he’s retiring because he wants “flexibility to spend more time” with his children and grandchildren “after 28 years of spending 4 days a week in Washington, D.C.”

King, a former chair of the House Homeland Security Committee, has cultivated a reputation for bipartisanship while maintaining a hard line on immigration and crime. He is the longest-serving Republican member of New York’s congressional delegation, and has been among the most pragmatic members of his party, especially as it has veered right.

King’s keen political instincts and reputation as a fighter for New York’s interests gave him remarkable political resiliency; at one point, after the 2008 election that sent Barack Obama to the White House, he was the state’s lone GOP member of Congress.

Representative King's exit marks the 20th House Republican to announce plans to leave Congress. Reuters

He won re-election in 2018 by just 6 percentage points.

He teamed up with powerful Democrats such as Chuck Schumer to win a huge Superstorm Sandy aid package after the 2012 storm, despite foot-dragging by GOP leaders. On Monday, the Senate Democratic leader took to Twitter to lavish praise on King.

“Peter King stood head & shoulders above everyone else,” Schumer wrote. “He’s fiercely loved America, Long Island, and his Irish heritage and left a lasting mark on all 3.”

Story continues below advertisement

His district includes once-reliably GOP territory in southwestern Suffolk County and a portion of Nassau County, about an hour’s drive east of Manhattan. It went narrowly for Trump in 2016.

In his brief stint as Homeland Security panel chair after Republican took back the House in 2010, King’s focus included the threat of Muslim extremism – attracting criticism that he was unfairly lumping in innocent Muslims with hearings on the alleged radicalization of others at some U.S. mosques.

“Peter King is an Islamophobe who held McCarthyite hearings targeting American Muslims, said ‘there are too many mosques in this country’ and blamed Eric Garner for his own death at the hands of police,” tweeted Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., one of two Muslim women in Congress. Garner died after rough handling during an arrest by New York City police for selling cigarettes.

Other critics have noted that when he was a rising Nassau County politician, King was an unapologetic supporter of the Irish Republican Army and its U.S. fundraising network.

King lost the Homeland Security gavel in 2012 because of GOP term limit rules.

More recently, King was an ardent backer of legislation to finance the health care of first responders who have gotten cancer or other severe health problems in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks at the World Trade Center. He also opposed the 2017 GOP tax overhaul bill, which cut back a federal deduction for state and local taxes that was a big benefit to King’s highly-taxed constituents.

Story continues below advertisement

Rep. Cheri Bustos, D-Ill., who heads House Democrats’ election arm, said King’s retirement “underlines just how serious Republicans’ problems are in swing districts across this country.” While her party has long targeted his district, she added, “We will compete to win it in 2020.”

Many suburban districts around the country have been moving steadily toward Democrats as moderate, well-educated voters swing away from the polarizing president.

Twenty House Republicans have announced they will not seek re-election. Three other GOP lawmakers have resigned and already left Congress.

Only a handful of Republican-held districts being vacated by retirements are expected to be seriously competitive next year, but King’s will certainly be among them. The GOP’s once-powerful grip on Long Island has long since loosened, though King’s seat has been in Republican hands for almost five decades.

Democrats retook the U.S. House majority in 2018, aided by victories in what had been GOP-held suburban seats from Virginia to California.

New York State Republican Party Chairman Nick Langworthy praised King and said, “We have every confidence we will retain this seat and continue the strong representation that Long Islanders deserve.”

Story continues below advertisement

Relatively unknown Democrat Liuba Grechen Shirley lost to King by 6 percentage points last year despite being significantly outspent and said Monday that she’s considering another run.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies