Skip to main content

Mexican Undersecretary for North America Jesus Seade speaks with the media during an availability at the Mexican embassy in Ottawa, Friday Nov. 29, 2019.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Mexico’s top trade negotiator said Wednesday that two or three issues must be resolved to Mexico’s satisfaction before finalizing a new trade agreement with United States and Canada.

Jesus Seade told reporters he has been working hard the last few days to reach agreement on a final version that answers demands made by U.S. House Democrats as part of the legislative ratification process.

“Lets hope (it will all be over) in the coming days, but I don’t want to speculate,” Seade said after meeting with his U.S. counterpart, Robert Lighthizer, for about three hours.

Story continues below advertisement

While Mexico’s Senate has already approved the pact, the Trump administration is negotiating with House Democrats on changes that would prompt House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to bring an implementation bill to the House floor for a vote. Both chambers of Congress must pass the bill before the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement goes into effect.

With the backing of labour unions, Pelosi has insisted on changes that ensure improved labour and environmental standards are enforced.

As part of the agreement, Mexico has strengthened laws protecting worker’s rights to organize and join the union of their choice. But unions have four years to comply with the measure requiring secret ballots on contracts. The change is meant to eliminate the longstanding practice in which pro-company “protection” unions sign contracts behind workers’ backs.

Some Democratic lawmakers have proposed adding a labour inspection system within the agreement to ensure Mexico follows through on the changes it passed into law. It’s unclear what Lighthizer and Democratic negotiators have presented to Mexico, but Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said Tuesday his government has rejected the use of U.S. and Canadian inspectors to ensure compliance with the country’s new labour laws.

He instead voiced support for a panel made up of a U.S. member, a Mexican member and a third panelist, “where specialists proposed by the countries deliberate as equals” in resolving disputes between unions and employers in Mexico.

The Business Coordinating Council, a trade group for the Mexican business community, said it has learned that the United States government recently submitted proposals to amend the trade pact and that some of the demands could severely affect the competitiveness of Mexico and its partners in North America.”

“Respect for the sovereignty of Mexico is not negotiable. The Mexican government will have our support to generate counterproposals and maintain a firm position in defence of the competitiveness of our country,” the trade group said in a press release.

Story continues below advertisement

The United States, Mexico and Canada agreed last year to replace the 25-year-old North American Free Trade Agreement with a new pact, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies