Skip to main content

Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett attends the second day of her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, on Oct. 13, 2020.Susan Walsh/Getty Images

U.S. President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, said on Tuesday she gave no commitments to the White House on how she would rule on Obamacare or election-related cases and declined to say if she believed landmark rulings legalizing abortion and gay marriage were properly decided.

Justice Barrett opted not to say whether she would step aside from taking part in a major Obamacare case to be argued on Nov. 10 or in any disputes arising from the Nov. 3 election – as Democrats have requested – as she answered questions for the first time on the second day of her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing.

The marathon questioning gave the conservative U.S. appellate judge a chance to respond to Democrats who oppose her because they fear she will cast a decisive vote in striking down the 2010 health care law formally called the Affordable Care Act and its protections for people with pre-existing conditions.

“I am not here on a mission to destroy the Affordable Care Act,” Justice Barrett said. “I’m just here to apply the law and adhere to the rule of law.”

Mr. Trump has asked the Senate, controlled by his fellow Republicans, to confirm Justice Barrett before Election Day. Mr. Trump has said he expects the Supreme Court to decide the election’s outcome as he faces Democratic challenger Joe Biden.

Justice Barrett said no one at the White House sought a commitment from her on how she would rule on that or any issue.

While Democrats were persistent in their questioning, the hearing retained a respectful tone and Justice Barrett remained even-tempered while nimbly sidestepping questions on her views on abortion, LGBT rights, gun control and voting rights.

In the Obamacare case, Mr. Trump and Republican-led states are seeking to invalidate the law. Justice Barrett said the case centred on a different legal issue from two previous Supreme Court rulings that upheld Obamacare that she has criticized.

The law, signed by Mr. Trump’s Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama, has enabled millions of Americans to obtain medical coverage. Democrats have blasted Mr. Trump for trying to kill Obamacare amid a deadly pandemic.

In declining to commit to stepping aside on politically charged cases in light of her nomination so near an election and comments made by Mr. Trump on the issues, Justice Barrett said she would follow rules giving justices the final say on recusal amid questions about impartiality.

Republicans have a 53-47 Senate majority, making Justice Barrett’s confirmation a virtual certainty. If confirmed, Justice Barrett, 48, would give conservatives a 6-3 Supreme Court majority. She is Mr. Trump’s third Supreme Court nominee.


Abortion rights advocates fear Justice Barrett would vote to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationwide. Asked about the ruling, Justice Barrett said she would consider the usual factors on whether to overturn a precedent.

But Justice Barrett indicated Roe v. Wade was not a “super-precedent” that could never potentially be overturned.

“I’m answering a lot of questions about Roe, which I think indicates Roe does not fall in that category. Scholars across the spectrum say that doesn’t mean that Roe should be overruled, but descriptively it does mean it is not a case that everyone has accepted,” Justice Barrett said.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, the panel’s top Democrat, asked Justice Barrett whether she agreed with her mentor, the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overturned.

After Justice Barrett sidestepped, Ms. Feinstein told her that “it’s distressing not to get a straight answer.”

Justice Barrett, a devout Catholic and a favourite of religious conservatives, said she could set aside her religious beliefs in making judicial decisions.

“I do see as distinct my personal moral religious views, and my task of applying laws as a judge,” Justice Barrett said.

Justice Barrett would not say whether she agreed with Scalia that the 2015 Supreme Court Obergefell v. Hodges ruling legalizing gay marriage nationwide was wrongly decided.

“I have no agenda and I do want to be clear that I have never discriminated on the basis of sexual preference and I would not discriminate on the basis of sexual preference,” Justice Barrett said.

She also declined to comment specifically on whether presidents should commit to a peaceful transfer of power if they lose an election. Mr. Trump created a furor in September when he refused to make that commitment.

“To the extent that this is a political controversy right now, as a judge I want to stay out of it and don’t want to express a view,” Justice Barrett told Democratic Senator Cory Booker.

Prompted by Mr. Booker again to comment, she said: “One of the beauties of America from the beginning of the republic is that we have had peaceful transfers of power.”

Asked about George Floyd, a Black man killed by Minneapolis police in May in an incident that triggered widespread protests, Justice Barrett called the issue “very, very personal for my family” because among her seven children, two – adopted from Haiti – are Black. Justice Barrett said she and one of her daughters, Vivian, cried together after seeing the video.

Justice Barrett said racism persisted in America but declined to give her view on whether it was systemic or how it should be addressed.

Mr. Trump nominated Justice Barrett to a lifetime post on the court on Sept. 26 to succeed the late liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The four-day confirmation hearing is a key step before a full Senate vote due by the end of October on Justice Barrett’s confirmation.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.