Skip to main content
// //

John Rood, the under secretary of defense for policy, speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon, in a Feb. 2, 2018, file photo.

Jacquelyn Martin/The Associated Press

President Donald Trump has ousted the Pentagon’s top policy official who had certified last year that Ukraine had made enough anti-corruption progress to justify the Trump administration’s release of congressionally authorized aid to Kyiv in its conflict against Russian-backed separatists.

John Rood resigned Wednesday, saying he was leaving at Mr. Trump’s request.

The Trump administration’s delay in releasing the aid to Ukraine was central to the President’s impeachment by the House on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The Senate voted to acquit the President. But in the wake of the Senate trial, an emboldened Mr. Trump has gone after officials he has perceived as being disloyal.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Rood is the latest official to be purged. His forced resignation comes as Democrats on the Hill express concerns that Mr. Trump is on a vendetta in the wake of his acquittal. Just days after the Senate vote, the White House reassigned an army officer, Lieutenant-Colonel Alex Vindman, a key witness in the impeachment inquiry, from the National Security Council, and pushed his twin brother, an NSC lawyer, out with him. Gordon Sondland, Mr. Trump’s ambassador to the European Union who also was a key witness before House investigators, was recalled from his post.

Mr. Trump tweeted Wednesday that he wanted to “thank John Rood for his service to our Country, and wish him well in his future endeavours!”

Mr. Rood, in his letter to Mr. Trump, did not mention Ukraine. “It’s my understanding from Secretary (Mark) Esper that you requested my resignation,” Mr. Rood said. Mr. Rood said he will step down as of Feb. 28.

Mr. Rood wrote in a May 23 letter to Congress that the Pentagon had made a thorough assessment of Ukraine’s anti-corruption actions and other reforms. And he said that, “I have certified that the government of Ukraine has taken substantial actions to make defence institutional reforms for the purpose of decreasing corruption” and making other improvements.“ Mr. Rood wrote that his certification, legally required before the aid could be released, was based on insights gained in “persistent U.S. engagement” with Ukraine, including meetings between the U.S. defence secretary and his Ukrainian counterpart.

Asked about Mr. Rood’s resignation, chief Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman declined to speculate on the reason for Mr. Trump’s decision.

“The president has the opportunity and the ability to have the team that he wants to have in policy positions,” Mr. Hoffman said at a news conference. He said Mr. Rood’s resignation letter spoke for itself.

Mr. Rood last year told reporters that, “In the weeks after signing the certification I did become aware that the aid had been held. I never received a very clear explanation other than there were concerns about corruption in Ukraine.” He also spoke in favour of releasing the aid, suggesting that withholding it would hurt America’s defence priorities.

Story continues below advertisement

Pentagon press secretary Alyssa Farah said James Anderson, who is currently serving as the deputy for policy, will take over the job until a permanent replacement is appointed by the President and confirmed.

Mr. Esper said Mr. Rood played “a critical role” on issues such as nuclear deterrence, NATO, missile defence and the National Defence Strategy.

Mr. Rood has served as undersecretary for policy since January, 2018, but also had worked in various government agencies including the State Department, the CIA and the NSC for more than 20 years. He held senior policy jobs mainly during Republican administrations and also served as a senior policy adviser to Senator Jon Kyl.

Mr. Rood also was a senior vice-president at Lockheed Martin International.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Follow related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies