Skip to main content

Rudy Giuliani, an attorney for President Donald Trump, waves to people during White House Sports and Fitness Day on the South Lawn of the White House, in Washington on May 29, 2018.

Andrew Harnik/The Associated Press

U.S. President Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani insisted on Sunday there was “nothing wrong” with the President’s 2016 campaign taking information from the Russians, as House Democrats pledged stepped-up investigations into campaign misconduct and possible crimes of obstruction detailed in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report .

Mr. Giuliani called the Trump campaign’s effort to get political help from representatives of the Russian government possibly ill-advised but not illegal.

“There’s nothing wrong with taking information from Russians,” Mr. Giuliani said, referring to a June, 2016, Trump Tower meeting involving Mr. Trump’s son Donald Jr., son-in-law Jared Kushner and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and a lawyer linked to Russia. The Trump campaign was seeking harmful information on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

Story continues below advertisement

The Sunday news shows offered the latest back and forth following the long-anticipated release on Thursday of Mr. Mueller’s 448-page redacted report on his two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Mr. Mueller found no evidence of a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign and made no decision on obstruction of justice.

Mr. Giuliani rebutted Senator Mitt Romney, who said in a statement on Twitter on Friday he was “sickened” by the findings in Mr. Mueller’s report that cited details on how the Trump campaign welcomed political dirt from Russia.

Mr. Giuliani said Mr. Romney should “stop the bull,” saying that accepting negative information about a political opponent is common. “I would have advised, just out of excess of caution, don’t do it,” he said. Nevertheless, “there’s no crime.”

Pressed about whether there is a something wrong about using information stolen by foreign adversaries, Mr. Giuliani said, “It depends on the stolen material.”

Mr. Trump, who spent the holiday weekend at his private Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Fla., asserted in tweets on Sunday that he had been fully cleared by Mr. Mueller’s report and that the Democrats’ continued efforts to investigate him will prove politically costly.

“Despite No Collusion, No Obstruction, The Radical Left Democrats do not want to go on to Legislate for the good of the people, but only to Investigate and waste time. This is costing our Country greatly, and will cost the Dems big time in 2020!” he tweeted.

Mr. Mueller explicitly did not exonerate Mr. Trump in the report on the question of obstruction, citing in part Justice Department guidelines that a sitting president shouldn’t be indicted.

Story continues below advertisement

Not ruling out impeachment, Representative Jerrold Nadler, who chairs the House committee that would hold impeachment hearings, said he remained puzzled why Mr. Mueller did not bring charges of criminal conspiracy against those in the Trump Tower meeting.

“All you have to prove for conspiracy is that they entered into a meeting of the minds to do something wrong and had one overt act. They entered into a meeting of the minds to attend a meeting to get stolen material on Hillary [Clinton]. They went to the meeting. That’s conspiracy right there,” Mr. Nadler said.

Mr. Nadler said it was now up to Congress to investigate after the special counsel said it did not establish enough evidence to bring charges of criminal conspiracy, yet detailed 10 allegations of Mr. Trump’s attempts to obstruct the Russia investigation that left open whether Mr. Trump broke the law.

Asked whether the offences are impeachable, Mr. Nadler told NBC, “If proven, some of this would be impeachable, yes.” He said Democrats’ current focus is to “go where the evidence leads us.”

Mr. Nadler has subpoenaed the Justice Department for the full, unredacted report and said on Sunday he was adding former White House counsel Don McGahn to the list of people he would call to testify before his committee, along with Mr. Mueller and Attorney-General William Barr. According to the special counsel’s report, Mr. McGahn was among the Trump aides who effectively halted Mr. Trump’s efforts to influence the Russia investigation, rebuffing his demand to set Mr. Mueller’s firing in motion.

Mr. Nadler has said he expects the Justice Department to comply with the subpoena for the full report by May 1, the same day Mr. Barr is to testify before a Senate committee and one day before Mr. Barr is to appear before Mr. Nadler’s panel. Mr. Nadler summoned Mr. Mueller to testify by May 23.

Story continues below advertisement

Democratic leaders are under mounting pressure from the party’s rising stars and some 2020 presidential contenders, including Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Julian Castro, a former Housing and Urban Development secretary, to start impeachment proceedings.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is pushing for a step-by-step approach to the House’s oversight of Mr. Trump and has refused to consider impeachment without public support, including Republicans. Ms. Pelosi is convening House Democrats on Monday to assess next steps.

Senator Mike Lee, a member of the judiciary committee, said it would be a “mistake” for Democrats to pursue further investigations that could lead to impeachment proceedings, arguing that the American public won’t stand for it after Mr. Mueller failed to conclude that crimes had been committed.

“It’s time to move on,” Mr. Lee said.

Mr. Giuliani said Mr. Trump’s legal team was weighing whether it would release a detailed written rebuttal to the Mueller report.

“It may become necessary, whether they go ahead with the hearings or not, whether other issues are raised by different people – there’s probably a point at which we’ll use it. Right now, we think the public debate is playing out about as well as it can,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

In the redacted report, Mr. Mueller said he considered bringing charges over the Trump Tower meeting, but ultimately did not obtain admissible evidence that the campaign officials involved knew the actions were illegal. The meeting had raised questions about whether Mr. Trump Jr. and others violated the federal ban on foreign contributions to American political campaigns.

“On the facts here, the government would unlikely be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the June 9 meeting participants had general knowledge that their conduct was unlawful,” the report said. “The investigation has not developed evidence that the participants in the meeting were familiar with the foreign-contribution ban or the application of federal law to the relevant factual context.”

Mr. Giuliani spoke on CNN’s State of the Union, Fox News Sunday and NBC’s ”Meet the Press.“ Mr. Nadler also appeared on NBC. Lee was on CBS’ Face the Nation.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter