Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

U.S. President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden participate in their first 2020 presidential campaign debate in Cleveland on Sept. 29, 2020.

BRIAN SNYDER/Reuters

It was billed as a debate. It was a slugfest. It was designed to provide a civil discussion on civic issues. The two nominees for the highest American office accused each other of obfuscation, or worse. By the time they were finished there was blood on the floor – but voters may be left with the sad conclusion that there is no floor to the way politics in the United States is conducted.

Nearly two-thirds of a century ago, Adlai Stevenson, the two-time Democratic nominee, proposed presidential debates such as the one a bipartisan commission conceived for Tuesday night’s 98-minute session in Cleveland. “Imagine discussion on the great issues of our time with the whole country watching,” the former Illinois governor said of an innovation that he believed would “transform presidential campaigning into a great debate conducted in full view of the people.”

That kind of debate may have occurred in a handful of earlier presidential debates. But not Tuesday night.

Story continues below advertisement

President Donald Trump taunted former vice-president Joe Biden by saying, “There’s nothing smart about you, Joe.” Mr. Biden said his rival was “a fool,” a “clown,” a “racist” and “a liar.” Mr. Trump said to Mr. Biden, “For 47 years you’ve done nothing.” Mr. Biden said to his opponent he was the “worst president America ever had.”

A combative Donald Trump faced Joe Biden at a presidential debate marked by personal insults and Trump's repeated interruptions Tuesday night. Catch up on key moments around Trump's taxes, the handling of COVID-19 and healthcare. Reuters

When the two stopped trading insults – when Mr. Trump finished calling Mr. Biden’s plans a “disaster” and Mr. Biden stopped saying to the President, “Will you shut up, man?” – voters in the United States and viewers in Canada and around the world saw two figures who did not veer from their familiar playbooks, or their profiles, or their positions in a debate full of conflict, contention and utter rhetorical chaos.

Mr. Trump spoke like a bulldozer, plowing through his points and over Mr. Biden. He accused the Democrat of veering left into socialism, asserted his business interests were in solid shape, argued he took advantage of existing personal-tax provisions, and said Mr. Biden’s plans would bring on “a depression the likes of which you have never seen.” With a style shaped in brutal business negotiations, reality television shows and 14 primary and general election debates in 2015 and 2016, he brought that approach and those lessons to the political stage.

For his part, Mr. Biden in three presidential campaigns going back a third of a century had dealt with rivals who basically agreed with his broad outlook and philosophy and, in many cases, with whom he had worked genially over the years on difficult political challenges in a legislative chamber with centuries-old codes of conduct, a social compact of comity.

Tuesday night’s contest was without established customs of comportment against a man he had never consorted with before and possessed of a personal profile and pugilistic style unlike anything that he had ever encountered. For 36 years, beginning with his introduction to political Washington at age 30, Mr. Biden shaped his public style from the manual of parliamentary behavior written by Thomas Jefferson in 1800 that opens with a chapter titled “The Importance of adhering to Rules” and that prohibits what the Senate described, in a rule adopted in 1806 and honoured ever since, as “exceptional words.”

In those pages there is this provision: “No one is to disturb another [person who is speaking] by hissing, coughing, spitting, speaking or whispering to another.” The moderator, Chris Wallace of Fox News, especially chided the President for repeated interruptions and at one point said of Mr. Trump’s traducing of the rules of civility to which the two sides agreed in advance, “Why don’t you observe what your campaign agreed to?”

Amid the imprecations and implications, faint signs of the two candidates' strategies were visible.

Story continues below advertisement

In his remarks on the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, Mr. Biden shaped his answer to female voters, emphasizing the impact her decisions would have on abortion rights and, specifically, pre-existing conditions for women. The Washington Post/ABC News Poll released Sunday showed Mr. Biden leads Mr. Trump among women by 31 percentage points. Mr. Trump’s defence of his economic policies stressed the recoveries in Ohio and Michigan, two states vital to his re-election, and his remarks on law and order emphasized safety in the suburbs, where many analysts believe the election will be decided.

One omission will play out over the next several days: Mr. Trump’s refusal to make an unambiguous condemnation of white supremacy.

The two men did conform to one rule set out for the debate. They did not shake hands either at the beginning or the conclusion of the session. The Commission on Presidential Debates need not have ruled out the handshakes customary for the conclusion of business meetings, for the Stanley Cup Final and for political debates in the United States, Canada and in most democracies. The custom dated to 5th century B.C. in Greece and endured as a symbol of peace and civility. There is little of each in today’s United States, and none in Tuesday’s presidential debate.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies