Skip to main content

Mr. Mulvaney said Mr. Trump did not like foreign aid, thought Ukraine was corrupt and was annoyed at how little 'lethal aid' European countries provided to Ukraine as it combatted Russia-backed separatists in the eastern part of the country.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

U.S. President Donald Trump’s withholding of US$391-million in military aid to Ukraine was linked to his request that the Ukrainians look into a claim – debunked as a conspiracy theory – about the 2016 U.S. election, a senior presidential aide said on Thursday, the first time the White House acknowledged such a connection.

Mr. Trump and administration officials had denied for weeks that they had demanded a “quid pro quo” – a Latin phrase meaning a favour for a favour – for delivering the U.S. aid, a key part of a controversy that has triggered an impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives against the Republican president.

But Mick Mulvaney, acting White House chief of staff, acknowledged in a briefing with reporters that the U.S. aid – already approved by Congress – was held up partly over Mr. Trump’s concerns about a Democratic National Committee (DNC) computer server alleged to be in Ukraine.

Story continues below advertisement

“I have news for everybody: Get over it. There is going to be political influence in foreign policy,” Mr. Mulvaney said.

He later contradicted himself, ruling out a quid pro quo in a statement from the White House.

In a July 25 call, Mr. Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for “a favour” to look into the server as well as the California-based cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which was hired by the DNC in 2016 to investigate hacking of Democratic e-mails that it later determined was done by Russia.

Mr. Trump also asked Mr. Zelensky to investigate a domestic political opponent, Joe Biden, and Mr. Biden’s son Hunter Biden, who had served as a director for a Ukrainian energy company. Mr. Zelensky agreed during the call to carry out the investigation that Mr. Trump sought. The U.S. aid was later provided to Ukraine.

The DNC server issue is a discredited claim that Ukraine and not Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election and that a Democratic Party computer server was being held somewhere in Ukraine. U.S. intelligence agencies and a special counsel investigation concluded that Russia used a campaign of hacking and propaganda to boost Mr. Trump’s 2016 candidacy.

Mr. Biden is a leading contender for the Democratic nomination to face Mr. Trump in the 2020 presidential election.

Mr. Mulvaney said Mr. Trump did not like foreign aid, thought Ukraine was corrupt and was annoyed at how little “lethal aid” European countries provided to Ukraine as it combatted Russia-backed separatists in the eastern part of the country.

Story continues below advertisement

“Did he also mention to me in the past, the corruption related to the DNC server? Absolutely. No question,” Mr. Mulvaney said, referring to Mr. Trump. “But that’s it. That’s why we held up the money.”

“The look-back to what happened in 2016 certainly was part of the things that he was worried about in corruption in that nation,” Mr. Mulvaney said, referring to Mr. Trump.

A reporter told Mr. Mulvaney that what he just described was a quid pro quo. “We do that all the time with foreign policy,” Mr. Mulvaney responded.

In his later statement, Mr. Mulvaney offered a different account, saying: “There was absolutely no quid pro quo.”

“There never was any condition on the flow of the aid related to the matter of the DNC server,” Mr. Mulvaney said.

Mr. Trump said he had a lot of confidence in Mr. Mulvaney.

Story continues below advertisement

Democratic members of the three House committees leading the impeachment inquiry pounced on Mr. Mulvaney’s earlier remarks.

Representative Gerald Connolly said: “I guess having failed at discrediting the facts of this case, they’ve decided on a new tactic, which is to admit them and basically say: ‘So what?'

“The answer to that is, well the ‘so what’ is you’re going to be impeached because that’s abuse of office. And extortion, the last time I checked, is still a crime,” he said.

U.S. DIPLOMAT TESTIFIES

Mr. Mulvaney’s comments came after the U.S. ambassador to the European Union said in written testimony in the impeachment inquiry that Mr. Trump told senior U.S. officials to talk directly to his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, about U.S. policy in Ukraine, raising concern that the President was outsourcing American foreign policy to a private citizen.

The envoy, Gordon Sondland, told lawmakers in the Democratic-led inquiry that he did not understand “until much later” that Mr. Giuliani’s agenda included a push for Ukraine to investigate Mr. Biden.

His testimony was the clearest sign yet that Mr. Trump’s efforts to erect a firewall around the White House and frustrate the Democratic-led inquiry’s efforts to interview administration officials are proving unsuccessful.

Story continues below advertisement

More testimony is expected next week, including from a top Pentagon official who oversees policy on Ukraine, two sources told Reuters on Thursday.

In prepared testimony, Mr. Sondland said he and two other officials – Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Ukraine Special Envoy Kurt Volker – were disappointed in Mr. Trump’s May order, but they followed it anyway. Mr. Sondland said he felt foreign policy should be the work of the State Department, not the President’s personal lawyer.

Mr. Trump said on Thursday that Mr. Perry would step down as energy secretary by the end of the year, adding he had known for months that Mr. Perry would resign. The former Texas governor said previously he had no plans to resign. He faces a Friday deadline to turn over documents in the impeachment probe.

Mr. Sondland, a Republican Trump political donor and a wealthy Oregon hotelier before being named by the President to his European Union post last year, also said that “inviting a foreign government to undertake investigations for the purpose of influencing an upcoming U.S. election would be wrong.”

His testimony underscored the pivotal role of Mr. Giuliani in the Ukraine scandal. Before the President’s July call with Ukraine’s president, Mr. Giuliani had been working to persuade Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.

The impeachment inquiry could lead to the House passing formal charges – known as articles of impeachment – which would prompt a trial in the Senate on whether to remove Mr. Trump from office. The Senate is controlled by Mr. Trump’s fellow Republicans, who have shown little inclination toward removing him.

Story continues below advertisement

MAY 23 MEETING

Mr. Sondland said that on May 23, three days after Mr. Zelensky’s inauguration, U.S. officials who had attended debriefed Mr. Trump and key aides at the White House.

The ambassador said the officials taking part in the meeting emphasized the strategic importance of Ukraine and the importance of the relationship with Mr. Zelensky, whom he called a reformer planning to fight corruption.

“We asked the White House to arrange a working phone call from President Trump and a working Oval Office visit. However, President Trump was skeptical that Ukraine was serious about reforms and anti-corruption, and he directed those of us present at the meeting to talk to Mr. Giuliani, his personal attorney, about his concerns,” he added.

“It was apparent to all of us that the key to changing the President’s mind on Ukraine was Mr. Giuliani,” he said.

During his White House briefing, Mr. Mulvaney acknowledged that Mr. Trump had directed officials to work with Mr. Giuliani on Ukraine, and defended the move as proper. Mr. Mulvaney denied that there was a “shadow foreign policy” on Ukraine led by Mr. Giuliani.

Mr. Giuliani did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Mr. Sondland’s testimony.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Sondland is the latest witness to speak to lawmakers in the impeachment inquiry about his knowledge of efforts by the President to urge Ukraine to investigate the Bidens as lawmakers investigate whether Mr. Trump committed any “high crimes and misdemeanors.” Mr. Trump withheld the military aid to Ukraine before making the request.

“Please know that I would not have recommended that Mr. Giuliani or any private citizen be involved in these foreign policy matters,” Mr. Sondland said.

While he expressed misgivings in his testimony about Mr. Giuliani’s role, other witnesses have described Mr. Sondland as being among a trio of senior U.S. officials who were considered more reliable than career diplomats in pressing Ukraine to launch investigations that might help Mr. Trump’s re-election bid.

Mr. Trump has accused the Bidens of corruption related to Ukraine, without offering evidence. The Bidens have denied any wrongdoing.

Mr. Sondland said he did not fully appreciate in late May what Mr. Giuliani’s intentions were regarding Ukraine.

“I did not understand, until much later, that Mr. Giuliani’s agenda might have also included an effort to prompt the Ukrainians to investigate vice president Biden or his son or to involve Ukrainians, directly or indirectly, in the President’s 2020 re-election campaign,” Mr. Sondland said.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Follow related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies