Skip to main content

U.S. Politics U.S. judge bans former Trump adviser Roger Stone from posting on social media

Roger Stone leaves federal court in Washington, on July 16, 2019.

Sait Serkan Gurbuz/The Associated Press

A visibly irritated federal judge on Tuesday banned President Donald Trump’s former adviser Roger Stone from posting on social media after prosecutors accused Stone of violating a gag order by repeatedly discussing his case on his Instagram account.

“Your lawyer had to twist the facts, twist the plain meaning of an order and twist himself into a pretzel” to argue that Stone’s social media posts did not violate her order, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson told Stone.

Jackson said she would not jail Stone for violating the order, saying holding a contempt hearing, which could result in jail time or a fine, would only generate more media attention that could affect potential jurors down the road. But the judge told Stone she could revisit her decision if he violates her orders again.

Story continues below advertisement

“So what am I supposed to do with you?” Jackson asked, noting she is “wrestling with behaviour that has more to do with middle school than a court of law.”

During the hearing, Jackson spent about an hour painstakingly reading each one of his posts aloud and asking Stone’s attorney Bruce Rogow if they violated her gag order, before taking an hour recess to weigh how she would rule.

One post, she said, featured a photo of Adam Schiff, the Democratic chairman of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee, next to a meter saying “bullSchiff.”

Another involved a statement that Stone e-mailed to Buzzfeed News to deny a statement that Trump’s former personal lawyer Michael Cohen made to lawmakers during a congressional hearing.

Stone, a long-time Republican political strategist and self-described “agent provocateur” and “dirty trickster,” is accused by prosecutors of lying to House Intelligence Committee investigators looking into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, as well as tampering with witnesses.

Stone is scheduled to go to trial in November after pleading not guilty to federal charges of making false statements to Congress, obstruction and witness tampering as part of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

Jackson said Stone referred to Schiff as a “duplicitous con man” before adding: “if it’s Schiff, flush it.” The judge then asked if the post was in “contravention” of her order.

Story continues below advertisement

Rogow told Jackson he did not think any of the posts violated the judge’s prior order, adding: “I am sorry the court is offended.”

“Mr. Stone has tried to hew to that line, and has he done it in a way that has offended the government? Apparently so,” Rogow added.

Mueller completed his probe in March, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia is now handling the prosecution of Stone.

Stone has repeatedly raised Jackson’s ire by making incendiary posts on Instagram and other social media platforms.

At the outset of the case, Jackson imposed narrow restrictions on what Stone could say publicly after the defendant implored her to let him discuss the case because his commentary is part of his livelihood.

But she quickly tightened the reins on his speech in February and ordered him to stop talking about the case, after he posted what appeared to be a threatening photo of her next to the image of gun crosshairs on his Instagram account.

Story continues below advertisement

Since then, however, Stone has repeatedly pushed the envelope, with some of his posts linking to articles about the case and asking rhetorical questions.

Prosecutors finally got fed up in June and filed a motion with the court asking Jackson to further restrain Stone from making comments that could poison the jury pool.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter