Visit our mobile site

The Globe and Mail

Jump to main navigation
Jump to main content

News Search
Search Stock Quotes
Search The Web
Search People at canada411.ca
Search Businesses at yellowpages.ca
Search Jobs at eluta.ca
402709 01: Stadium employees remove letters from one of the Enron Field signs March 21, 2002 in Houston, TX. The Houston Astros paid $2.1 million to get back the naming rights to their stadium from collasped energy trader Enron.

Ten years after its collapse into scandal, the real legacy of Enron lies in the less visible reforms, which have fundamentally changed how companies operate, business leaders say. CEOs rely on boards far more in strategic planning, directors are more demanding in their oversight, and companies increasingly consider broader questions of governance in their social and environmental decisions. (James Nielsen/Getty Images)

Board Games survey
Poll: How does corporate governance inform your investment decisions?

Share your views in our interactive survey

Inmet Mining chairman David Beatty
Earlier discussion
Should corporate governance matter to shareholders?

David Beatty answered readers' questions during a live discussion Friday

Board Games 2011
Video: Why company CEOs and chairs should be separate

William A. Dimma, veteran board director, explains how corporate boards have changed over the years

Business reporter Janet McFarland
Audio
Podcast: Janet McFarland looks back on 10 years of Board Games

Report on Business online editor Claire Neary talks to Janet McFarland about the annual Board Games project, why it got started, why we keep doing it and what’s changed over the years.

The Potash Corp logo at the entrance of the company's office tower in downtown Saskatoon, SK. on November 3rd, 2010.
In pictures
Canada's 10 best governed companies of 2011

Find out which Canadian companies round out Board Games' top 10 list this year

Slideshow
A decade of Board Games: What have we learned in 10 years?

Starting in 2002, The Globe and Mail has closely examined corporate governance practices in Canada for the past 10 years

Board Games 2011: More stories and the rankings

Board Games 2011 corporate governance rankings

Find out which companies came out on top in The Globe and Mail's 10th annual review of corporate governance for Canada's public companies

Board Games 2011 Methodology

See the questions that made up this year's rankings for all companies: corporations and income trusts

Shareholder group pushes for detailed reports of board votes

Investors also want to vote for directors individually, rather than as a slate, coalition tells OSC

Board Games

‘Say on pay’ votes for shareholders popular with Globe readers

First-ever corporate governance survey shows strong interest in board governance and compensation issues

Board Games

Winners and losers in Board Games 2011

How some companies rate in this year’s Board Games

Board Games

Verbatim: Prominent corporate directors on how boards have changed

Ten veterans of of Canada's boardrooms weigh in on the changing role of corporate governance in Canada

Where corporate boards have improved the most, and where they’re failing

What the numbers say about how corporate governance has changed in Canada over the past 10 years

In pictures

Enron and the biggest corporate governance scandals of the past decade

A recap of some of the biggest corporate governance scandals that hit in the last 10 years

Case studies

Case Study

Taking on global leadership at Methanex

How a tight-knit board can prevent clubbiness and foster growth

Case Study

EPCOR tackles hard choices with ambitious board

It faces the question of how to thrive amid greater regulation and the need for new capital market strategies

Case Study

Raising the bar at CN Rail

How the board has achieved considerable success -- and what it must do in the future

Summary

Corporate Governance: From golden rules to golden principles

How the three boards in our case studies raised their game

Board Games videos

Video: Why company CEOs and chairs should be separate

William A. Dimma, veteran board director, explains how corporate boards have changed over the years

What has governance reform really accomplished?

William A. Dimma, veteran board director, on the benefits of corporate governance reform

Video: The best governance change in the past decade

William A. Dimma, veteran board director, discusses how governance reform has changed board meetings

Video: Improving corporate oversight, part one

BNN looks at whether greater public scrutiny has lead to better corporance governance, speaking with Globe and Mail reporter Janet McFarland and former OSC Chairman Peter Dey

Video: Improving corporate oversight, part two

BNN looks at whether greater public scrutiny has lead to better corporance governance, speaking with Globe and Mail reporter Janet McFarland and former OSC Chairman Peter Dey

How much has corporate governance improved?

Paul Waldie and Boyd Erman report from The Globe and Mail

The Board Games archive (2002-2010)

2010: Proxy advisory firms flex muscle

As their clout has grown, so has the discontent from companies unhappy with their influence over shareholder votes

2009: Women on Board

While women appear to be making headway in the boardrooms of the nation, a lack of CEO experience and access to some crucial business networks mean that directorships are still proving elusive

2008: Board reforms face crucial test

Top corporate directors say governance reforms will prove their worth or be exposed as posturing as times get tough

2007: Companies improve their disclosure

As reporting gets better, more reach top tier

2006: Income trust boards - The new 'Wild West'

There are few rules and fewer standards

2005: Income trusts under the spotlight

They could be doing a much better job

2004: Crisis management on the agenda

Companies realize it pays to plan for the worst

2003: Corporate Canada opening up

The largest companies make big improvements

2002: The inaugural report

A Report on Business team examined the corporate governance practices of 270 of Canada's largest companies and found most of them wouldn't meet tough new standards recently adopted by the United States.