Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Report on Business

Economy Lab

Delving into the forces that shape our living standards
Best Business Blog, EPPY awards, 2011 and 2012

Entry archive:

Economy Lab has moved

Only Globe Unlimited members will now have access to a wide range of insightful commentary
and analysis on the economy and markets previously offered on this page.


Globe Unlimited subscribers will be able to read these columns,
written by some of Canada’s most deeply respected economists,
such as Christopher Ragan, Sheryl King, Andrew Jackson, and Clement Gignac,
as part of our ROB INSIGHT section.


All of our readers will still be able to browse the Economy Lab archives and read our
broader coverage of economic data and news by accessing their 10 free articles a month.


Learn more about Globe Unlimited and how to subscribe.

Job seekers wait in line at a job fair in Toronto in September. (Matthew Sherwood for The Globe and Mail)
Job seekers wait in line at a job fair in Toronto in September. (Matthew Sherwood for The Globe and Mail)

Economy Lab

Headline jobs numbers don't tell the real story Add to ...

Today’s Labour Force Survey release is bad news: employment fell by 54,000 between September and October. But look at last month’s release: an increase of 61,000 between August and September. Both numbers are large: the typical monthly change in employment is about 20,000 jobs.



It seems likely that at least one of these numbers is a statistical glitch, possibly due to changing seasonal employment patterns in sectors such as education.

More related to this story

Statistics Canada’s estimate for the standard error of its LFS employment numbers is 27,200, so there’s roughly a one in twenty chance that a given employment number could be over- or under-estimated estimated by up to 54,000 jobs in a given month. The odds of seeing two consecutive errors of that magnitude are very small, so which month is the one-in-twenty outlier?



Another important LFS series is hours worked -- a series that is even more strongly correlated with GDP growth than employment. Hours worked fell even more sharply than did employment during the recession; instead of layoffs, many employers simply cut back on hours.



Hours worked jumped sharply in July and peaked in August, which is why we’re expecting a reasonably good GDP number for the third quarter. But since then, hours worked has fallen slightly. It’s hard to reconcile September’s strong jump in employment with falling hours worked.



Employment and hours worked



My reading of these numbers suggests that much of September’s increase of 61,000 was statistical noise and that October’s number set the record straight. The two-month increase of 15,900 between August and October -- an average increase of less than 8,000 per month -- seems more consistent with the other data we’re seeing.



Follow Economy Lab on twitter



Stephen Gordon's recent posts and Twitterfeed can be viewed here.

Follow on Twitter: @stephenfgordon

 

In the know

Most popular video »

Highlights

More from The Globe and Mail

Most Popular Stories