Skip to main content

The House passed legislation Wednesday that would guarantee broadband internet users equal access to online content, in a crucial step toward bringing back so-called net neutrality regulations overturned at the start of the Trump administration.

In a 232-190 vote, divided along party lines, the Democratic majority made good on a promise that became a rallying cry in many liberal circles during the 2018 election. It is also expected to be held up as an issue by Democrats in 2020.

But the legislation, called the Save the Internet Act, faces long odds in the Republican-led Senate. Senate Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said this week that the legislation would be “dead on arrival.” Earlier this week, the Office of Management and Budget advised the White House to veto the law if it were to come to the president’s desk to sign into law. The office said in a letter that since the law was overturned, the broadband industry has thrived, a good sign of how deregulation helps the economy.

Story continues below advertisement

The legislation prohibits blocking and throttling web traffic and categorizes broadband as a service open to heavy regulation. Supporters say the regulation will prevent companies from blocking or slowing the delivery of content like videos. Opponents say it will strap broadband providers like Verizon and Comcast with heavy-handed restrictions, and could lead to price controls.

“We need a law that puts a cop on the beat who will enforce the laws because we can’t just rely on internet providers to say this will be a free and open internet,” Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., said in an interview. “No one believes them.”

The Federal Communications Commission rolled back the country’s net neutrality rules in November 2017. Shortly after, internet companies and public interest groups sued to overturn the FCC action, which was led by Ajit Pai, the agency’s chairman.

In addition, more than two dozen states have raced to create their own net neutrality laws. The Justice Department and telecommunications companies have, in turn, filed lawsuits to block the state efforts.

Net neutrality, a regulatory idea hatched by academics, has been a decadelong battle pitting Silicon Valley and consumer groups against the telecommunications sector. Companies like Google, Mozilla and Facebook have argued that without rules, telecommunications companies can become gatekeepers of online content by choosing the quality of delivery for web services in a way that could hurt rivals and consumers. The Obama administration sided with their argument, with the FCC approving new regulations in 2015.

Now, the companies are pushing for law on the issue. A group of 120 startups, including Stripe, Medium and GitHub, wrote a letter to Democratic and Republican leaders in support of the bill.

“Net neutrality is fundamental to guaranteeing that every American has unencumbered access to the internet,” the companies wrote. “This access is also essential to a competitive, free market for the technology economy to thrive as well as entrepreneurship in this country.”

Story continues below advertisement

The biggest disagreement between Republicans and Democrats is whether broadband should be considered a utility like phone service. Republicans say that doing so could lead to the possible regulation of broadband rates. Democrats say the categorization is an important update that recognizes the importance of broadband to the economy, culture and education.

“Some in Congress are trying to give the government more control again, applying utility-style regulations that would threaten the internet as we know it. We should reject these efforts,” Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said on the Senate floor last week.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies