Skip to main content

The U.S. Department of Commerce has reduced tariffs it is imposing against most Canadian newsprint in its final ruling, a move that lessens the impact on American newspapers already struggling financially.

“This was a complicated and unique case. The department worked hard to address the arguments raised, and I am satisfied that the final determinations appropriately targets bad actors,” Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said in a statement on Thursday.

In its decision, the Commerce Department reduced the final tariffs to 20.26 per cent for Richmond, B.C.-based Catalyst Paper Corp. and 9.53 per cent for Montreal-based Kruger Inc. The preliminary duties on uncoated groundwood paper, including newsprint and book-grade paper, totalled 28.25 per cent for Catalyst and 32.09 per cent for Kruger.

Story continues below advertisement

Montreal-based Resolute Forest Products Inc. saw its final duties rise to 9.81 per cent, compared with 4.42 per cent.

Other Canadian groundwood producers face paying final tariffs of 8.54 per cent, compared with 28.69 per cent in the preliminary determination earlier this year, on shipments into the United States.

“Despite the slight reduction in some duties, Canada remains disappointed with the final duty rates announced by the U.S. Department of Commerce,” Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland said in a statement in Ottawa.

The News Media Alliance, which changed its name in 2016 after being known as the Newspaper Association of America, said the underlying problem of extra newsprint costs due to continuing duties lingers for U.S. publishers. “Although this is a step in the right direction, the reduced rates only lessen the pace at which the tariffs are harming the industry,” alliance president David Chavern said.

The Commerce Department continued to exempt Connecticut-based White Birch Paper Co., which has three Quebec paper mills through its Canadian unit, from paying duties on its groundwood sales into the United States. White Birch isn’t on the hook for cash deposits because its tariff is under the threshold required for the United States to collect duties.

Resolute’s mills in Canada were hit with the countervailing rate of 4.42 per cent in January, but in March, the Commerce Department did not include Resolute on the list of Canadian producers subject to anti-dumping tariffs.

Resolute spokesman Seth Kursman said the company is disappointed by Thursday’s ruling. “Tariffs on uncoated groundwood paper are harming the very U.S. manufacturing sector they are supposed to protect, and are damaging to newspapers, printers, book publishers and a range of other customers of our industry," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Canadian newsprint producers that paid 28.69 per cent in preliminary tariffs included Alberta Newsprint Co., New Brunswick-based J.D. Irving Ltd. and Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc.’s Canadian unit. They will receive partial refunds for amounts paid earlier this year since the final duties for them are lower at 8.54 per cent.

The impact of higher newsprint prices already has been felt in decreased demand. Canadian producers have been able to pass on most or all of the preliminary tariffs to U.S. customers.

In its two preliminary decisions earlier this year, the Commerce Department imposed anti-dumping tariffs averaging 22.16 per cent in March against most Canadian producers, on top of levying countervailing duties of 6.53 per cent in January. The final ruling results in the elimination of anti-dumping duties on most Canadian producers, but imposes a weighted average of 8.54 per cent in countervailing duties.

The case has its roots in Washington State, where North Pacific Paper Co., also known as Norpac, produces groundwood. Norpac, which is owned by hedge fund One Rock Capital Partners LLC of New York, first lodged its complaint with the Commerce Department in August, 2017.

Norpac said on Thursday that it had hoped the Commerce Department would have taken a tougher final position. “We are disappointed that the Department of Commerce did not impose anti-dumping duty deposits” on many Canadian producers that had paid preliminary tariffs, Norpac said in a news release.

Norpac claims that subsidies for Canadian groundwood producers include discounted electricity rates, unfair financial assistance and low “stumpage” rates charged by provincial governments for cutting down trees.

Story continues below advertisement

On or about Aug. 29, the U.S. International Trade Commission is to vote on whether to uphold its preliminary finding last year that Canadian groundwood shipments have injured the U.S. mills. The ITC’s reasons for its decision are set to be released on Sept. 17.

“We hope the International Trade Commission will reverse this tax on paper,” said Michael Makin, president of Printing Industries of America.

Canadian producers would benefit if the ITC overturns the tariffs, resulting in refunds. But, if the ITC upholds its preliminary decision to side with Norpac’s position, the Canadian government is expected to challenge the newsprint tariffs by taking the fight to the World Trade Organization.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter