Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Canada’s most-awarded
newsroom for a reason
Stay informed for a
lot less, cancel anytime
“Exemplary reporting on
COVID-19” – Herman L
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney updates media on measures taken to help with COVID-19 in Edmonton on March 20, 2020.

JASON FRANSON/The Canadian Press

Canada’s beleaguered economy has an $80-billion-a-year stimulus injection sitting right in front of it, and it won’t cost its governments a penny to pick it up. They won’t have to raise taxes to pay for it. They’ll actually make money from it – lots of it.

What would it take?

“One weekend,” former Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz told an online forum last week.

Story continues below advertisement

It would have to be a heck of a weekend. Removing Canada’s largely indefensible barriers to interprovincial trade would require a rare collective political goodwill among provincial premiers, and serious leadership from Ottawa.

But if the COVID-19-imposed economic carnage and government debt explosion aren’t enough to convince provincial leaders to roll up their sleeves for a couple of days to drain the protectionist quagmires, I don’t know what will.

“Politics is the art of the possible. I see no reason why this isn’t possible,” Mr. Poloz said.

The event at which Mr. Poloz spoke – the True North Free Trade Forum – was an initiative by the Ontario government to kick-start the conversation among provincial governments and business leaders. Every province was represented at the forum – evidence that, at least in principle, there is a national consensus that interprovincial trade liberalization is a no-brainer.

“I think everybody understands how much unlocked potential there is,” Ontario Minister of Economic Development Vic Fedeli, who hosted the event, said in an interview last week.

An oft-cited 2019 paper from the International Monetary Fund, co-authored by University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe, estimated that administrative barriers to trade of goods across provincial borders cost the country the equivalent of 4 per cent of annual gross domestic product. As Mr. Poloz pointed out, removing them would create more than $2,000 per person of new income, and generate about $20-billion in additional tax revenue, each and every year.

“Everyone in the country would get a raise, instead of higher taxes,” Mr. Poloz said.

Story continues below advertisement

While tariffs between provinces are prohibited under the terms of Confederation, provinces still throw up walls of regulations, government procurement restrictions and licensing requirements that drive up the cost and complication of doing business across provincial borders. Statistics Canada has estimated those barriers are equivalent to a nearly 7-per-cent tariff.

Yet a paper last week from the Montreal Economic Institute noted that since the provinces signed the Canadian Free Trade Agreement in 2017 – a pact many had hoped would form the groundwork for a meaningful opening of provincial borders – most provinces have done little to nothing to reduce these trade barriers.

The agreement contains a long list of “exceptions” for each province that allow them to maintain certain barriers. Two provinces – Alberta and Manitoba – decided to unilaterally eliminate most of their remaining exceptions, but the rest of the country has not been eager to join them.

The pandemic has created a compelling reason to get eager. It has seriously accelerated the need for provinces to unlock economic growth, create new jobs and, critically, lift their tax revenues.

“The potential gains could make the difference in the post-COVID economic recovery, especially with the deficits of certain provinces reaching record heights since the start of the crisis,” the MEI report said.

Mr. Fedeli is certainly saying the right things about the postpandemic importance of clearing the path of interprovincial trade. He describes the True North forum as evidence Ontario is “taking the initiative on expanding internal trade right across the country.”

Story continues below advertisement

Yet when discussing details, Mr. Fedeli talks about making bilateral, province-to-province agreements on harmonizing regulations in specific sectors, and about keeping the conversation going at a ministerial level. He’s not eager to discuss doing what Alberta did, and unilaterally dropping Ontario’s CFTA exceptions. The words “first ministers’ meeting” don’t leave his lips, even when prompted.

He’s certainly not giving off a nation-building “one weekend” vibe. If Ontario was willing to kick-start the conversation, leadership in bringing the provinces to the table will have to come from elsewhere.

The obvious place for that would be Ottawa’s doorstep. Where, unfortunately, this issue – once a high priority for the Liberal government – has gotten lost in the COVID-19 shuffle.

The Liberals promised in their 2019 election platform to “take bold steps to make free trade within Canada a reality.” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau identified the task as a top priority for his most important cabinet minister, Chrystia Freeland.

Then the pandemic happened, and priorities shifted dramatically. Interprovincial trade wasn’t even mentioned in last November’s 237-page fall economic statement.

That’s a major policy omission for a government that talks a lot about its commitment to a strong postpandemic economic rebuild. It’s high time for Ottawa to rediscover its former zeal to lead this cause, and to push for a first ministers’ meeting on interprovincial trade soon. Mr. Poloz’s vision of the possible isn’t going to happen without that leadership.

Story continues below advertisement

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies