Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Federal Reserve governor Lael Brainard speaks at Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., on March 1, 2017.

Brian Snyder/Reuters

The U.S. central bank is flagging a turning point in monetary policy, as a Federal Reserve policy-maker on Friday backed interest rate hikes in the “near term” but nodded to increasingly less certainty ahead.

Speaking at an event in Washington, Federal Reserve governor Lael Brainard said the economic picture was broadly positive but that risks were growing overseas and in the corporate debt markets at home. Tailwinds, she said, are fading as global growth slows, financial conditions tighten, and the boost from fiscal stimulus moderates.

“The gradual path of increases in the federal funds rate has served us well by giving us time to assess the effects of policy as we have proceeded,” she told the audience. “That approach remains appropriate in the near term, although the policy path increasingly will depend on how the outlook evolves.”

Story continues below advertisement

Speaking less than an hour later, St. Louis Federal Reserve bank president James Bullard repeated his call for the Fed to pause its current cycle of interest rate increases, saying the central bank may already be restricting the economy and noting that inflation expectations are drifting downward.

“We are at a crossroads in monetary policy,” said Bullard, who next year will be a voting member on the Fed’s policy-setting committee. With inflation contained and at no risk of breaking out, investors are nervous the Fed has gone too far, he suggested.

Recent market developments and an expected further interest-rate increase means there is a “real risk” the Treasury market yield curve could invert this month, Bullard said. The yield curve is said to invert when interest rates on shorter-term debt rise above rates on longer-term debt, and historically portends a coming recession.

Traders continue to bet on a Fed rate hike in two weeks, when policy-makers will next meet and, importantly, release fresh forecasts for the rate path for next year and beyond.

As of just a few months ago, Fed policy-makers had indicated they would probably increase interest rates three times in 2019.

But with recent data showing the housing market slowing, job gains cooling, and inflation giving no signs of rising above the Fed’s 2-percent target, there are plenty of “reasons for hinting at a pause in March,” Cornerstone economist Roberto Perli said in a note Friday.

Since the middle of last month, Fed policy-makers have pointed to the need to reconsider what have been steady quarterly rate hikes for most of the past two years.

Story continues below advertisement

It began with Fed Chair Jerome Powell telling Dallas Fed chief Robert Kaplan in an onstage interview that policy-makers may need to “slow down” amid growing uncertainty, just as someone feeling their way through a dark room filled with furniture would need to do.

Later that month he repeated that metaphor and noted rates are only “just below” a neutral level, a remark that sent markets soaring as traders took it to mean fewer interest-rate hikes ahead.

Then last week, in minutes of the Fed’s November meeting, policy-makers were clear they are preparing to ditch a long-standing promise for “further gradual increases” to the Fed’s policy rate.

Kaplan earlier this week called for “patience” on further rate increases.

It was so even with New York Fed President John Williams, who believes so deeply in the need for slow but steady rate increases he used to give away T-shirts printed with the word “gradual.” Late on Thursday he noted that tariffs have hit business confidence and could slow economic growth.

President Donald Trump has taken aim at Powell for raising rates. And on Friday Trump’s top economic adviser said in an interview on Bloomberg television that he expects the Fed to pause for “quite some time” after December.

Story continues below advertisement

Brainard, in her remarks, was careful to note that rate policy could go either way, saying twice that risks are on both sides of the economy’s likely growth path.

Fed hawks have long contended that financial stability risks call for further rate hikes to tamp down dangerous risk-taking.

Stopping after just one or two more rate hikes, when rates would be at most between 2.5 per cent and 2.75 per cent, would make the Fed’s job harder by giving it less leeway to cut rates to offset any future downturn.

And with unemployment at 3.7 per cent, some economists think, upward pressure on inflation is only a matter of time.

“We continue to think the Fed’s got more work to do,” JP Morgan economist Michael Feroli said in a note on Friday.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies