Skip to main content

The United States moved to maintain pressure on the European Union in a 16-year dispute over aircraft subsidies by flagging possible changes in tariffs on EU goods, as the date for a decision on reciprocal EU duties slipped to the autumn.

The latest development in the dispute over subsidies to Europe’s Airbus and U.S. rival Boeing comes as the aerospace industry has been severely weakened by the novel coronavirus crisis and amid steps by some governments to support aviation via airlines or suppliers, as well as furlough schemes.

The U.S. Trade Representative’s office added items valued at US$3.1-billion to its list of European goods eligible to be hit with duties – including black olives, beer and gin – and said it could switch gears to target other items on a previously published list or raise existing duty levels further.

Story continues below advertisement

Britain – one of four Airbus core countries and still part of the case despite leaving the EU – on Wednesday urged Washington not to add more tariffs, warning that tit-for-tat measures hurt businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.

A spokesman for the European Commission said Washington’s approach could exacerbate problems caused by the coronavirus, and might even “go beyond what is authorized under the WTO.” The EU’s priority remained finding a negotiated solution, he said.

The U.S. move is part of a “carousel” approach aimed at maintaining pressure on the EU to reach a settlement and end a dispute that dates back to 2004, dragging through three U.S. presidents and five presidential terms of office.

Both sides have won partial victories at the World Trade Organization, and have signalled interest in settling the matter, but are waiting to see final rulings from the WTO, according to sources familiar with the process.

Last year, the WTO allowed the U.S. to levy tariffs on US$7.5-billion worth of EU goods, including aircraft, wines and cheese, because of Airbus subsidies that it had deemed illegal.

Now it is considering the level of tariffs that the EU could impose in a parallel case involving illegal support for Boeing.

That decision, initially expected in May or June, has been pushed back to at least September owing to the coronavirus health crisis, two people familiar with the case said.

Story continues below advertisement

A third source said the decision was not expected until October, weeks before the Nov. 3 U.S. presidential election.

The WTO declined to comment.

The timing raises the possibility that the EU would be allowed to impose its own tariffs on U.S. goods weeks before the U.S. presidential election, although foreign states tend to avoid taking high-profile actions during such campaigns.

Analysts say both sides share an interest in settling the issue to provide a rule book for future competition with China, which is developing its own passenger jets.

For now, each side claims to have obeyed the WTO while accusing the other of ignoring thousands of pages of rulings.

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies