Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Comedian Mike Ward speaks to the media at the Quebec Appeal Court Jan. 16, 2019 in Montreal.

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press

Quebec’s highest court largely upheld a human-right’s tribunal’s ruling requiring a comedian to pay damages to a disabled singer he mocked, while overturning the part of the decision that ordered Mike Ward to also pay $7,000 to the victim’s mother.

In a split decision, two of the three judges argued Mr. Ward’s comments about Jérémy Gabriel’s disability compromised the young performer’s right to the safeguard of his dignity and could not be justified, even in a society where freedom of expression is valued.

In 2016, Quebec Human Rights Tribunal ordered Mr. Ward to pay $35,000 in moral and punitive damages to Mr. Gabriel based on comments Mr. Ward made during shows between 2010 and 2013.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Gabriel has Treacher Collins syndrome, a congenital disorder characterized by skull and facial deformities. He became a celebrity in Quebec after he sang with Celine Dion and for the Pope.

In his act, Mr. Ward joked that he thought Mr. Gabriel’s illness was terminal and people were only nice to him because he would soon die. Mr. Ward joked that after he realized the child was not going to die, he tried to drown him.

In a written decision, Justices Claudine Roy and Geneviève Cotnam noted the comments that were deemed discriminatory were those that related specifically to Mr. Gabriel’s disability, including the shape of his head and his hearing aids.

“The Tribunal carefully analyzed the evidence and its conclusion that Mr. Gabriel showed a distinction, exclusion or preference, based on his disability, that has the effect of jeopardizing his right to full equality in the recognition of his right to dignity, honour and reputation is not unreasonable,” they wrote.

In a statement posted to his Twitter account, Mr. Ward said he would refuse to pay the fine and planned to take his case to the Supreme Court of Canada.

He said comedy is not a crime.

“In a ‘free’ country, it shouldn’t be up to a judge to decide what constitutes a joke on stage,” he wrote. “The people in attendance laughing already answered that question.”

Story continues below advertisement

During the appeals process, Mr. Ward’s lawyer had argued that the jokes, while distasteful, were not discriminatory, and that a comedian’s right to speak their minds must remain legal in a free and democratic society.

The appeals court disagreed, noting that freedom of expression has its limits, and that “comedians must nevertheless realize that artistic freedom isn’t absolute and they are, like all citizens, responsible for the consequences of their actions when they exceed certain limits.”

A third justice, Manon Savard, disagreed with their conclusions.

While it upheld the $35,000 in damages awarded to Mr. Gabriel, the Court of Appeal ruled that Mr. Ward should not have to pay $7,000 to the singer’s mother as previously ordered.

While Mr. Gabriel’s family were undoubtedly hurt by the comments, there was no evidence that his mother was directly the victim of discrimination, the court ruled.

The comedian’s lawyer, Julius Grey, said he would seek leave to appeal the case to the Supreme Court.

Story continues below advertisement

The rejection of the mother’s claims, plus the strength of the third judge’s dissent, amounted to a “partial victory” despite the defeat, he said in a phone interview.

Mr. Grey said his client was willing to continue the legal battle largely in order to defend the right of comedians, and all citizens, to artistic expression.

“I think we’re living in a society where freedom of expression has played second fiddle to all the other considerations, and I think it’s time – I hope its time – to reinstate freedom of speech as a fundamental value, a transcendental value really,” he said.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies