Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Green Party Leader Annamie Paul attends a press briefing in Toronto on July 19, 2021. Paul has said she and the Greens cannot speak publicly about why the non-confidence vote and membership review were put on hold until at least Aug. 21, when a general convention is scheduled.

Chris Young/The Canadian Press

The fight within the Green Party has spilled over to the courthouse.

Court filings show the Green Party of Canada aims to overturn arbitration orders that stymied threats to Annamie Paul’s leadership, ending a brief ceasefire between warring factions ahead of a likely federal election this year.

In a notice of application filed Wednesday in Ontario Superior Court, the party, along with the Green Party of Canada Fund, says an arbitrator exceeded his authority in requiring party executives to cancel their non-confidence vote against Ms. Paul as well as a review of her party membership.

Story continues below advertisement

The documents state that Ms. Paul’s employment contract was with the Green fund, a separate legal entity that controls the party purse strings, rather than with the party proper, whose federal council was ordered to call off its moves to depose the leader.

“As an unincorporated association, the party has no legal capacity to enter into a financial employment contract,” the application reads. “Only the Fund may incur expenses and therefore enter into an employment contract.”

The arbitrator “erred in law” because he had no authority to impose orders on an entity that is unconnected with Ms. Paul’s contract, the filings argue.

Green president Liana Canton Cusmano sent an e-mail obtained by The Canadian Press to membership Wednesday saying the party disputes a claim made by Ms. Paul about confidentiality rules.

Ms. Paul has said she and the Greens cannot speak publicly about why the non-confidence vote and membership review were put on hold until at least Aug. 21, when a general convention is scheduled.

“I’ve provided as much clarity and transparency as I can,” she told reporters Wednesday. “What we do have now is certainty, for a while in any case. We know there will be no further motions introduced.”

That certainty is now out the window with a legal proceeding under way.

Story continues below advertisement

The end of an externally imposed truce from earlier this week casts doubt on Ms. Paul’s attempt at a news conference Monday to show her party has pushed past a tumultuous period as Canada’s 44th federal election looms.

Green party spokeswoman Rosie Emery declined to comment. Ms. Paul’s office and Canton Cusmano did not respond immediately to requests for comment.

Ms. Paul initiated the arbitration process earlier this month, according to the legal application.

Other problems threaten to hobble the Greens, including a payroll that was cut in half this month owing to financial imbalances reported by party brass, despite Ms. Paul’s objections to the temporary layoffs.

Green executives have also moved to withhold funding from Ms. Paul’s campaign to win Toronto Centre as she canvasses almost daily in the riding following two unsuccessful attempts that have kept her out of the House of Commons.

The nixed non-confidence vote, initially slated for last Tuesday, could have resulted in a party-wide vote next month to oust her. The application says an arbitrator halted the process and ordered that no similar motions be proposed by the current federal council – the party’s main governing body, set to turn over on Aug. 19 – or before the next party convention, scheduled for Aug. 21.

Story continues below advertisement

Meanwhile a membership review was on track to suspend Ms. Paul’s baseline status in her own party before the arbitrator froze the process.

The applicants argue the arbitrator incorrectly concluded the Green members’ code is “trumped” by Ms. Paul’s employment agreement as well as a party bylaw stipulating that the leader can only be removed from office by a general vote following a non-confidence vote by council, according to the arbitrator.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies