Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

The construction site of the hydroelectric facility at Muskrat Falls, is seen in a July 14, 2015, file photo.

Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press

Former premier Danny Williams told the Muskrat Falls inquiry Tuesday he remained confident in his government’s detailed assessment of the hydro megaproject’s potential risks, even as the judge hearing the inquiry said they haven’t seen evidence that a thorough review was undertaken.

The hydroelectric dam on the Lower Churchill River has essentially doubled its estimated costs to more than $12.7-billion since it was sanctioned in 2012, resulting in a public inquiry into schedule and cost overruns.

Justice Richard LeBlanc, who is leading the inquiry, said Tuesday that for a costly government endeavour like Muskrat Falls, he expected to see documentation of input from other departments like finance, natural resources and the treasury board looking at potential financial impacts on Newfoundland and Labrador.

Story continues below advertisement

LeBlanc said inquiry staff have reviewed documents up until November 2010, a month before Williams retired from politics, and they have not yet found evidence of detailed internal government scrutiny.

“One thing we haven’t found so far is any of that, in any of the documents that were produced, at least up to November,” LeBlanc said.

“It is a bit surprising to us that we haven’t seen that.”

The commission of inquiry is reviewing 2.5 million documents, and LeBlanc noted that the evidence might still appear during the hefty investigative process.

Williams agreed with LeBlanc that a project of such magnitude warrants serious financial study, and said his government would not have merely accepted Crown corporation Nalcor Energy’s cost estimates and analyses at face value.

Williams believes the project was properly assessed over the course of the eight years before it was sanctioned by Kathy Dunderdale’s government in 2012, but couldn’t speak to who in exactly in government would have carried out such analyses.

He said the reviews may not have been done by the province’s finance department specifically, but declared his trust in the integrity of his government’s former officials, and he believes the paper trail is out there.

Story continues below advertisement

“Knowing these individuals, there certainly would be scrutiny of the numbers going through,” said Williams.

“There’s a lot of people that went through this and had a look at it and assessed it.”

Williams was also questioned by lawyer Caitlin Urquhart, representing the Labrador Land Protectors and Grand Riverkeeper Labrador, about consideration of potential environmental impacts like methylmercury poisoning downstream from the site – fears that nearby communities still consider unresolved.

Williams said he believes the project is clean and sustainable, and he’s confident that officials who “know more about it than I do” appropriately assessed the complex environmental concerns.

He also took questions from the Concerned Citizens Coalition counsel Geoff Budden, representing some of Muskrat Falls’ most outspoken critics, about whether the former premier has taken critiques of the project seriously.

Williams said he thinks constructive criticism is a good thing but remained adamant that he has a right to push back against his critics in a “democratic society.”

Story continues below advertisement

“I’ve got to try and defend what I’ve done,” said Williams.

The 824-megawatt hydroelectric dam, which is more than 90 per cent complete, will send power to Newfoundland and later Nova Scotia through subsea cables.

Follow related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies