Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Douglas Snelgrove attends his trial at a St. John's school acting as an off-site location for the Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court in September 2020.

Sarah Smellie/The Canadian Press

A Newfoundland and Labrador police officer was found guilty Saturday of sexually assaulting a young woman while he was on duty in 2014, bringing a long-awaited end to a gruelling case that was tried in court three times.

A jury delivered the verdict on Saturday afternoon, after deliberating for more than a day in the case of Royal Newfoundland Constabulary Const. Carl Douglas Snelgrove, who they found sexually assaulted the 21-year-old woman in her living room after driving her home from a St. John’s nightclub in his police car.

Upon hearing the verdict, she leapt out of her chair and ran over to the prosecution team.

Story continues below advertisement

Outside the courtroom, Crown prosecutor Lloyd Strickland said he’s glad the case is finally over, especially for the complainant.

“I’m very much in awe over her,” he said. “She remained constant while the system stumbled around her.”

Saturday was the end of Snelgrove’s third trial on the charge, following a successful appeal of an acquittal in 2017 and a mistrial last year.

The woman testified all three times, often shooting back at defence lawyer Randy Piercey while on the stand.

“You gotta know, this is this man’s life, right?” Piercey asked her at one point during her testimony on May 6, referring to Snelgrove.

“Yes, I do know that,” she quickly replied. “This has been six years of my life, as well.”

The trial began on May 5 in a makeshift courtroom set up in a former St. John’s school to accommodate physical distancing protocols.

Story continues below advertisement

The jury began deliberating on Thursday and delivered its verdict around 4 p.m. on Saturday.

The case has loomed over St. John’s since Snelgrove was first acquitted in 2017.

Enraged protesters gathered that night and yelled outside the stone Supreme Court building downtown. Demonstrations then spread across town to the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary headquarters.

The case also figures prominently in the structures of power and authority underpinning two recent, award-winning St. John’s-set novels: “All I Ask,” by Eva Crocker and “Small Game Hunting at the Local Coward Gun Club” by Megan Gail Coles.

“I think this case has moved the discussion around consent forward by light years,” author Lisa Moore told the Canadian Press in a Facebook message.

It has also moved the law around consent forward, the Crown prosecutor told reporters on Saturday.

Story continues below advertisement

In 2017, the court wouldn’t let him argue that Snelgrove abused his position of authority as a police officer and thereby nullified any consent the woman may have provided, if she provided it at all, Strickland said. It was on that point that his office appealed and won.

Snelgrove then challenged that appeal with the Supreme Court of Canada, but the court sided with Strickland, thus opening the door for further arguments on those grounds.

“In four years, which has been a very long time for her, but in the bigger sense is not a great deal of time, we’ve seen this shift,” he said. “I think it is an important case in that respect.”

Even before the verdict was read Saturday, people were gathered outside the Supreme Court building on Duckworth Street, holding signs and chanting in support of the woman, who they’ve called “Jane Doe.”

“As a survivor of sexual abuse myself, I see a lot of myself in Jane Doe,” said Sarah Saint-Clare, who brought a box of communal Timbits for the demonstrators to share. “Cases like this (are) why people don’t go to the police.”

Her father, Bill Janes, was the chief of the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary during Snelgrove’s first trial, and that meant she couldn’t join the protests back then, though she said she wanted to.

Story continues below advertisement

He’s since retired, and she was at the courthouse Saturday morning by 10 a.m. to hoist her sign and raise a fist in solidarity with the woman.

“Hopefully, if this comes back guilty, it will bring back the confidence that women have had in the past when it comes to reporting their assault,” she said.

Snelgrove will be back in court in June for the judge to set a date for his sentencing.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 15, 2021.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies