Skip to main content

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford gestures during a special council meeting at City Hall in Toronto November 18, 2013. Toronto's City Council voted overwhelmingly on Monday to limit further the powers of embattled Toronto Mayor Rob Ford, who denounced the move as a coup d'etat and warned political foes of an election battle next year to rival the Gulf War. Ford has been under fire after admitting to smoking crack cocaine, buying illegal drugs and driving after drinking alcohol.

AARON HARRIS/REUTERS

A number of you have written to me to praise, question, encourage or assail The Globe's coverage of Toronto Mayor Rob Ford. The comments ranged from readers wanting more tough questions asked, to those who think the media is harassing Mr. Ford. Others echoed Mr. Ford's political message track that he is a little guy fighting the rich elites while a few wondered why Justin Trudeau isn't facing the same kind of scrutiny. Let's deal with a question first:

If the media had done their job, we would have known this stuff before he was elected. Where were you three years ago?

This question is a great one because it suggests responsibility on the part of both the media and the electorate to understand who they are voting for and what their policies are likely to be. The media needs to be fair and balanced and outline the pros and cons of the candidates. While most of the articles leading up to the municipal election were about who was leading in the polls or what their policies were, The Globe and other media have covered the travails of then city councillor Rob Ford over the years. The issues about his behaviour at the Air Canada Centre, the drunk driving and marijuana possession charge were well covered.

Story continues below advertisement

Here is a mayoral primer written days before the municipal vote.

Here is a column and another one about some of his controversies.

More coverage

On the issue of continuing coverage and investigating, here's an excellent note from a reader who wants to know more after my Saturday column Why the media keep pushing for the facts.

"But not nearly hard enough," he said. "Nearly everything we have seen in the past few weeks is common or garden reporting. It took no effort at all to report that Ford is guilty of associating with dangerous criminals, racism, homophobia, intimidation, issuing death threats, using illegal drugs, driving under the influence, abuse of staff, serial lying, public drunkenness and foul language. And sending lawyers to court is both easy and routine.

"What this emerging story really needs is some good old-fashioned investigative reporting. Much like the excellent Globe and Mail piece earlier this year on the drug history of the Fords. The answers are out there. Please pursue them with relentless and urgent investigative journalism before the story is scooped by the British or American press. Because that would be just a further embarrassment to Toronto and Canada."

Here's another reader wanting more, with high standards.

Story continues below advertisement

"I have read your article in (Saturday's) Globe and Mail and I agree that media has the obligation to keep the public informed even if it has to seek court's help. However, I also think media has the obligation to provide the information without any bias. It should be totally independent and non-judgmental."

Several readers wrote in to say keep up the good work and don't stop reporting. Here's one:

"I think the media has generally covered the Ford circus quite reasonably. Aside from a picture in one Toronto paper, I forget which one, of him leaving a KFC fast food outlet with a paper bag, which was really no one's business, I think the coverage has been quite fair. There is always a grey area with public figures, how does his public life affect his private life and vice versa? But Ford has gone to extremes, he displays much of the worst of his private life in public and sometimes these are associated with his official position. I think the public is entitled to know that. And Ford has eventually admitted to everything the media has reported."

There were also a number of readers who criticized the coverage.

"I am disappointed in the vicious callousness of your paper…… The so-called "Ford Nation" is the epitome of powerful interests. The longer this sad affair continues fanned by virtually the entire Canadian and U.S. and now British media, the more the larger picture is going to emerge and even become revolutionary. It is the weak poor and middle class (read 'Ford Nation') versus the 1 per cent ."

That same note of the elites versus Ford Nation (even though the Ford family runs a multimillion dollar business) was expressed by another reader who said: "I am one of these who think Rob Ford has been hounded beyond belief right from the beginning – a blue collar, red-faced overweight guy who just doesn't have the 'right' image for the sophisticated GTA."

Story continues below advertisement

One reader noted that there have been no charges against Mr. Ford and another said they felt he had been singled out for media attention.

"The media is shocking in their actions, ongoing harassment and daily [often up to the minute] reporting of the actions of Toronto Mayor Rob Ford. While the man has communicated his use of drugs and alcohol publicly [and apologized], he has never been charged with a misdemeanour."

And finally a suggestion that the media is being much tougher on Mr. Ford than on federal Liberal Justin Trudeau, who admitted he smoked marijuana three years ago. "I would submit that there would very likely be other political or business leaders who would not survive the kind of intense media scrutiny that Mr. Ford has endured favourably. I haven't seen accusatory reporters lining up in Justin Trudeau's driveway asking him about his drug use."

If you have any questions or comments, please e-mail me at publiceditor@globeandmail.com

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies