Skip to main content

Bauer hockey gloves are seen in this file photo. Canadian companies say they’ll benefit from an cut to import tariffs on hockey equipment.

Handout

The makers of equipment for Canada's favourite game say the Conservative government's decision to cut tariffs on imported hockey gear should be a big plus for both themselves and for consumers.

"On its face, this seems to be a net positive thing for consumers," said Kevin Davis, chief executive of Bauer Performance Sports Ltd.

"The devil is in the details, but we would expect to be able to provide products to retailers at a lower cost," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

The major hockey-equipment manufacturers in Canada now make most of their equipment offshore, which means they can take advantage of Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's move to reduce tariffs – expected to be unveiled in today's budget.

Bauer still makes some products in Canada, but the majority are now made in Asia, said Mr. Davis.

The company is the dominant player in both the National Hockey League and at the retail level. It makes sticks and skates as well as every piece of equipment, from protective pads to pants and helmets.

Richard Desjardins, product manager at Sher-Wood Hockey Inc., echoed Mr. Davis' comments.

"This is going to be good news for consumers," he said.

"We're already paying too much in tariffs."

Sher-Wood pays between 13 and 16 per cent in tariffs on its products, which are all made in Asia, said Mr. Desjardins.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's been years since most hockey equipment stopped being made in Canada. So it makes sense to revise the tariffs," he said.

The federal government's decision on hockey-gear tariffs is part of a pilot project to determine whether the loss in customs revenue is compensated for in sales tax.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies