Go to the Globe and Mail homepage

Jump to main navigationJump to main content

Baja Mining Corp. employees work on construction at the Boleo Mine project near Santa Rosalia, Mexico, in this undated handout photograph made available to the media on April 23, 2012. Source: Baja Mining Corp. via Bloomberg (Via Bloomberg)
Baja Mining Corp. employees work on construction at the Boleo Mine project near Santa Rosalia, Mexico, in this undated handout photograph made available to the media on April 23, 2012. Source: Baja Mining Corp. via Bloomberg (Via Bloomberg)

Fabrice Taylor

Mining sector feels cold splash of reality Add to ...

Fabrice Taylor, CFA, publishes the President’s Club investment letter. His letter and The Globe and Mail have a distribution agreement. You can get a free copy here.

The biggest risk in mine investing isn’t geology or third-world dictators or metallurgy. The biggest danger is purely financial. It’s called dilution.

Most of us underestimate how devastating this process can be until it’s too late. Simply put, dilution is when your economic interest is watered down. If a company you've invested in sells new stock and the share count goes up more than the value of the company, your investment is diluted. The more it can sell its new shares for, the less you'll be diluted.

Waves of dilution usually herald the beginning of the end of the investing cycle in mining. I think we’re close.

By way of example consider the travails of Baja Mining Corp. It’s a junior miner with a promising copper-cobalt-zinc project in Mexico. The company has spent hundreds of millions bringing the project to the cusp of production. In late March it told shareholders that construction of the site infrastructure was on schedule for production next year. It also said that the cost to build the mine was creeping up and that it would try to find ways to cut costs to bring the project in on budget.

On Monday, Baja treated its owners to some unpleasant news: the cost to build the project would come in at $246-million more than originally expected, a 22 per cent increase over the original costs that were estimated only two years ago.

The stock, not surprisingly, collapsed from about $1 to as low as 30 cents, with the market cap plunging to $130-million. That’s bad, but it’s just one part of the company’s problems. It now needs to come up with a lot of money fast to bring its mine into production. It will most likely have to sell new shares to do so. Let’s assume it needs to raise $100-million through the sale of fresh shares. At $1 that would have increased the share count by a hefty 30 per cent. At 40 cents the dilution will be a brutal 73 per cent.

Existing shareholders who don’t partake in this financing, should it materialize, will lose more than half their current interest in the company. Dilution is painful and permanent. It never goes away.

One hopes the company can find alternatives to equity so that the dilution can be kept to a minimum, but some pain for shareholders is guaranteed as the market reaction proves.

Baja isn’t alone. Batero Gold Corp. was something of a market darling until it produced a resource estimate that made investors sob in late February. The stock price was ravaged when the company reported that it has 6 million ounces of gold but that the grade is so low it’s questionable whether the project will ever become a mine. The quantity and grades are important factors, but the stock price is more important. A year ago it was $6. On the day of the announcement it was just under $3. Today it’s 57 cents. Even raising just $10-million to keep exploring and developing would send a tidal wave of dilution over existing owners.

And it’s not just the smaller players. Look at Kinross Gold Corp. and its disastrous purchase of Redback Mining, which owned the supposedly wonderful Tasiast mine in Mauritania. I cast doubts on that deal a couple of years ago in this space and for my troubles got an invitation to meet management in the Kinross boardroom, where I was politely lectured for 45 minutes. But just this January the company announced that the mine would be a lot more expensive to build than first thought and that it will take a very big writedown on the deal, which was paid for in stock. Investors have seen billions of dollars of wealth disappear through dilution.

The reason I associate dilution with the beginning of the end of the mining cycle is twofold: first, because I assume that the more promising deals get done earlier in the cycle, the more marginal ones later.

Second, when shareholders get soaked by dilutive deals, they eventually say “no more,” and that’s happening. Despite the fact that many mining projects have net present values that are multiples of their market caps, companies are having trouble raising money. If you can’t raise money at the right price, you’ve got nothing. Investors should keep this in mind.

Report Typo/Error

Follow us on Twitter: @GlobeInvestor


Next story




Most popular videos »

More from The Globe and Mail

Most popular