Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

unknown/Getty Images/iStockphoto

There is something deeply satisfying about seeing an investment theory splatter on the windshield of the market. The road is littered with the carcasses of past investment theories.

But today let's look at the notion that Shiller's P/E should be high when long-term interest rates are low.

Before driving into the details it's good to review what Professor Robert Shiller's P/E ratio is all about. At first glance the ratio looks a lot like the familiar price-to-earnings ratio. But while the standard P/E formula divides a stock's price by its earnings per share over the last year, Prof. Shiller's method divides the stock's price by its average inflation-adjusted earnings over the last 10 years. He calls the result a cyclically adjusted P/E ratio, or CAPE.

Story continues below advertisement

In contrast to a standard P/E ratio, CAPE gives you a much better picture of how prices stack up against a stock's typical earnings power. It smoothes out temporary gains or losses.

CAPE is particularly interesting when you apply it to the entire market, which Prof. Shiller does for the S&P 500 . As things stand the market's ratio is fairly high at 20.5 when compared to its historical average of 16.4. Bears use the ratio as evidence that the S&P 500 is overvalued by roughly 20 per cent, all else being equal.

However, an esteemed colleague recently pointed out that Shiller's P/E is impacted by interest rates and made the case that the ratio should be high when long-term interest rates are low. Problem is, practice tells a different tale.

It turns out the relationship between Shiller's P/E and interest rates isn't straightforwardly linear. It has a bit of a hump, which you can see in the accompanying graph that displays how average CAPEs vary by interest rate.

You'll immediately notice that low interest rate environments haven't automatically resulted in high P/Es even though high rates have historically led to P/Es. Instead, bulls who dream of bubbles and high P/Es should want interest rates to be somewhere in the middle.

Let's focus on times when interest rates are low. The second graph shows just such a period. It covers the two decades from 1935 to 1955, which saw a wide range of economic and geopolitical conditions.

As you can see, it is entirely possible for the market to trade at low ratios when rates are low. If anything the recent ratios have been high compared to past levels.

Story continues below advertisement

If you just consider times when interest rates have dipped below 3 per cent, you'll find that Shiller's P/E has averaged 13.6.

As a result, history provides even more meat for the bears because it bolsters their arguments that stocks are pricey. A decline of about 34 per cent would be needed to bring Shiller's P/E back to its historic norms after adjusting for interest rates, all else being equal.

But there is a fair amount of variability in the data, which holds out a slender reed of hope for the bulls that this time may be different.

Infographic: Getting a handle on valuations

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies