Skip to main content

David Lloydsmith at his home in Mission November 29, 2013. David Lloydsmith could lose his home because of BC forfeiture laws.

John Lehmann/The Globe and Mail

British Columbia's ombudsperson says there is a "high level of public concern about the fairness" of the province's increasingly controversial seizures of property deemed to be proceeds of crime – and is asking the public to complain to her so she can probe the process.

Ombudsperson Kim Carter is pointing to rising unease about administrative forfeiture, which speeds the government's ability to seize property worth less than $75,000 by not requiring a case be proven in court.

Her request for complaints – which would allow her office to investigate administrative forfeiture – came on the same day The Globe and Mail published a report on the process, part of a months-long investigation into the B.C. Civil Forfeiture Office.

Story continues below advertisement

In 2011, B.C. became the first province in the country to introduce administrative forfeiture. "It's important that people know they can come to us if they feel a government agency such as the Civil Forfeiture Office has not dealt with their problem adequately or fairly," Ms. Carter said. "Often when we're able to resolve one person's complaint, it can lead to changes that improve things for many others in similar situations," she said.

B.C. Justice Minister Suzanne Anton said Wednesday the government will not review the office. Ms. Anton and Premier Christy Clark have said they're confident in the work the office is doing and do not see any need for a closer look, though such a move has been backed by the opposition and a former attorney-general.

The ombudsperson's office is able to make findings and recommend solutions to systemic problems and report to the legislative assembly.

B.C.'s Civil Forfeiture Office was created in 2006 to fight organized crime, but has come to have a wider reach. B.C. has been among the most aggressive of the provinces in pursuing property and cash in this way. Although it launched three years after Ontario, B.C. has hauled in $2-million more: $41-million to Ontario's $39-million. Unlike Ontario, B.C. issues its office budget targets, which have gone up over the past two years.

Ninety-nine per cent of the people the B.C. office targets settle on terms favourable to the office.

B.C. has taken on 921 administrative forfeiture cases since the process was introduced. Of the $41-million the office has seized in total since its creation, $3-million has come from administrative forfeiture cases. Alberta and Manitoba have followed B.C.'s lead and introduced administrative forfeiture programs.

When asked for comment about the ombudsperson's announcement, a spokesperson said Ms. Anton's earlier statement stands.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Carter said concerns about the administrative forfeiture process are not much different from other kinds of issues her office deals with. She said her office earlier this week released a report that found the Ministry of Social Development was not meeting its own legislated requirements and more than 900 clients lost out on benefits.

"A number of individual complaints came to us, we ended up doing a broader investigation and found out there were a lot more people who were adversely affected," she said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter