Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson does a phone interview with The Globe and Mail at City Hall on Nov. 13.

DARRYL DYCK/The Globe and Mail

Mayor Gregor Robertson appears to be trying to defuse a storm that blew up last week after Councillor Adriane Carr publicly suggested the city manager had bullied her and acted politically.

Another councillor, Vision Vancouver's Geoff Meggs, filed an official complaint that Ms. Carr had violated the city's Code of Conduct, which prohibits staff or politicians from criticizing each other publicly, even though Ms. Carr later apologized for her personal remarks.

But Mr. Robertson said he would like to avoid an investigation into that complaint.

Story continues below advertisement

"The mayor's preference is to resolve the matter more informally and without the need to involve a third party," said a brief statement from the mayor's office Monday. "He is very hopeful that they can arrive at a sensible resolution and put the matter to rest."

That conciliatory statement is the latest chapter in a brawl over the city's community centres that has been dominating public conversation in recent weeks.

Some community-centre associations, which run the city's centres jointly with the city-funded but independently elected park board, have been complaining that they were being pressured by the board to sign a new agreement.

They said the agreement would give the board total control over the revenues and programming the associations now have.

Those complaints spiralled into a series of messy public meetings.

That has propelled Vision Vancouver, which controls city council and the park board, into defensive manoeuvres, while both right- and left-wing opposition groups have looked for ways to press the issue.

Ms. Carr, the city's only Green Party councillor, tried to get a motion onto the council agenda last week, asking the city to calculate how much it would cost the parks system if association volunteers were replaced by paid park-board employees.

Story continues below advertisement

City manager Penny Ballem advised Ms. Carr before the meeting that she was not going to allow that motion since it would compromise the negotiations going on between the board and the community-centre associations over their legal agreement.

Ms. Carr then went out to the media to complain about Ms. Ballem's interference, saying that she "felt bullied" and implied that the city manager was politically motivated.

She apologized later for anything she said that appeared to be personal.

But Mr. Meggs filed an official complaint anyway, saying it was important to clarify the line politicians need to be aware of when it comes to criticizing staff.

"My objective was not to inflict any punishment or star chamber proceedings, but to get a better idea of what the boundaries are."

Ms. Carr, while pleased that the mayor seems to be trying to defuse the situation, said the whole complaint is just an example of Vision "trying to divert attention from their own behaviour and trying to put attention on me."

Story continues below advertisement

She said she won't be silenced, as she tries to raise the issue of whether her motion should be heard by council and whether the city manager overstepped her authority by unilaterally deciding the motion shouldn't be allowed on the agenda.

Mr. Meggs says Ms. Carr is welcome to raise those issues all she likes, but that she shouldn't be calling the city manager names while she does it or suggesting that the manager is partisan.

What's confusing for many in the public is understanding what the role of senior city staff is in highly political debates like this.

Many municipal politicians say that they rely on their staff – managers, clerks, lawyers – to advise them whether their motions are properly worded or appropriate for a public meeting.

But they also say that it's typically left to the elected politicians, not the staff, to make the ultimate decision on whether a motion on a highly charged issue should be brought to council.

In Vancouver, the most politicized council in the province, relationships between councillors and the city manager have been strained on more than one occasion.

Story continues below advertisement

The current Vision councillors often complained behind the scenes about whose side previous city manager Judy Rogers was really on. None of them, however, made those kinds of criticisms publicly.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies