Skip to main content

Native drummers sing a song along with demonstrators standing outside the Joint Review Panel looking into the Northern Gateway Pipeline in Prince George, B.C., Oct. 9, 2012.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The National Energy Board is planning to bypass British Columbia as it unveils a long-awaited decision on whether it supports or opposes the Northern Gateway pipeline that will have a massive impact on the province.

The board plans to hold a media lock-up in Calgary, but does not have similar plans to brief reporters in British Columbia, says an official with the independent federal agency established to regulate international and interprovincial issues around the electrical utility, gas and oil sectors.

Board spokesperson Sarah Kiley said Thursday that the board recognizes there is an interest in B.C. in the subject, and said there is no final plan yet.

Story continues below advertisement

The office of the B.C. Environment Minister declined comment on the situation, but the opposition environment critic said it was outrageous not to unveil the report in B.C.

"The risk of Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline is B.C.'s. The biggest implications of approval are to B.C. and our coast," said Spencer Chandra Herbert (Vancouver-West End).

He said the energy board should not be hiding out in Calgary when they announce what they are going to do, regardless of whether they approve or reject the project.

"You would think they would have the ability and respect for B.C. to host it here and explain whatever decision they make here to B.C. media and intervenors," he said.

"We're worthy of that respect."

Gateway is a 1,177-kilometre pipeline that would bring oil-sands bitumen from Alberta to Kitimat, B.C. for shipment to Asia. The board is expected to release its report on the $6.5-billion project by the end of 2013, setting the stage for a federal cabinet decision on the project next year.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.