Skip to main content

Clean-up operations after the April, 2011, Rainbow Pipeline rupture and oil spill near Peace River, Alta.

Jimmy Jeong/www.jimmyshoots.com

John Carruthers, president of Northern Gateway Pipelines, has dismissed a report by Simon Fraser University that calls into doubt the oil-spill risk assessments done by Enbridge.

In a written statement, Mr. Carruthers attacks the study by Dr. Thomas Gunton, director of the School of Resource and Environmental Management at SFU.

"We are very concerned about the misleading report released by Tom Gunton, who also was a witness for the Coastal First Nations organization during the Northern Gateway Joint Review Panel process," states Mr. Carruthers.

Story continues below advertisement

He said Northern Gateway experts "have identified a number of omissions, flawed assumptions and modelling errors in the study and have serious concerns with its conclusions."

Specifically, Mr. Carruthers states that the spill probability numbers in the SFU report are inflated.

"The authors use oil-throughput volumes that are nearly 40 per cent higher than those applied for in this project which also inflates the number of tanker transits using these inflated volumes," he states.

The study, released Thursday, concluded that if the Northern Gateway pipeline is built, there will be more spills than Enbridge has predicted.

Dr. Gunton said the study applied an internationally accepted U.S. model, known as the Oil Spill Risk Analysis, and used Enbridge's own numbers to calculate the risk.

His report concludes there would be a tanker spill every 10 years, not once in 250 years, as calculated by Enbridge.

And the study predicts 776 oil and condensate spills from pipelines over 50 years, not 25 spills over 50 years as projected by Enbridge.

Story continues below advertisement

Dr. Gunton said the report took over a year to complete and it was not ready in time to be submitted as evidence before the federal Joint Review Panel which is now examining the proposed pipeline.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter