Skip to main content

British Columbia Panel reverses decision, asks for ALC’s input on Site C dam proposal

Farmer Lynda Peterson recently made a submission to the Joint Review Panel assessing the impact of the proposed Site C dam. This image shows farmland that will be drowned if the dam goes ahead.

Lynda Peterson

The Joint Review Panel examining the Site C dam proposal has reversed an earlier decision and is now asking B.C.'s Agricultural Land Commission for input on a project that could drown thousands of hectares of farmland.

The last-minute decision, which comes just before public hearings end Thursday, was made despite a provincial government attempt to keep the ALC out of the process.

"The Panel would appreciate if the Agricultural Land Commission would provide its written advice as to the process it would follow … were the project not excluded from the requirements of the Agricultural Land Commission Act," Brian Wallace, counsel to the federal-provincial panel, said in a letter Monday to the directors of the ALC.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Wallace asked the ALC "to provide its advice as quickly as possible," saying the public only has until Feb. 3 to make final written comment.

Colin Fry, executive director of the ALC replied by e-mail saying the matter will be discussed by the board this week.

The exchange between the two bodies came despite a letter Energy and Mines Minister Bill Bennett wrote in December, in which he sought to block ALC involvement in the Site C review.

"The province is aware that one of the issues at the [JRP] hearing will be the effect of the project on agricultural land, some of which is within the Agricultural Land Reserve," Mr. Bennett stated in a letter to Stephen Bellringer, chair of BC Hydro, which was copied to Richard Bullock, ALC chair. "I am writing to inform you that the government's current view is that this process should not be duplicated … under the Agricultural Land Commission Act."

Under legislation, the ALC is supposed to review applications to remove land from the ALR. But Mr. Bennett's letter was a clear signal that the ALC was not to assess the effect of the proposed dam on farmland in the Peace River Valley.

"The Joint Review Panel has a very comprehensive process in place and are free to seek out information from whomever they think can offer input," Mr. Bennett said Wednesday in an e-mail to The Globe and Mail. "This is an independent process which is not complete and I will not be commenting further until after the Panel has made a final recommendation."

If the Site C dam goes ahead, about 3,000 hectares of farmland will be inundated by a reservoir.

Story continues below advertisement

Last week, the Peace Valley Environmental Association urged the JRP to seek advice from the ALC, saying the loss of farmland would be dramatic, but the panel flatly rejected the request.

Then Joan Sawicki, a former NDP cabinet minister and long-time defender of the ALR, appeared before the JRP. She reminded the panel that while in cabinet in the 1990s, she had been in charge of B.C.'s Environmental Assessment Office. And she argued that the JRP couldn't do its job properly without considering the effect of the proposed dam on agricultural land.

She said a significant swath of prime farmland will be lost if the dam goes ahead and she urged the JRP to get the ALC involved.

Mr. Wallace later sent Ms. Sawicki an e-mail informing her that "the panel has reconsidered its decision."

Ms. Sawicki said in an interview Wednesday that she is pleased by the decision, but is concerned the ALC might not have enough time for a full response.

"It's very, very late in the game. It's going to be hard for the ALC to respond," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Sawicki was also critical of "the government's underhanded … way of by-passing the ALC," through Mr. Bennett's letter to BC Hydro.

Among those making presentations to the JRP last week was Lynda Peterson, a farmer who let a series of scenic photographs of threatened agricultural land do the talking for her.

"If every British Columbian could spend just one day in the valley, the outcry to stop this dam project once and for all would be resounding," she stated, showing the panel photos portraying some of the rich farmland that would be drowned.

After ending public hearings this week, the JRP has until the end of April to submit its recommendations to the federal and provincial governments.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter