Skip to main content

British Columbia Richmond, B.C. votes to ban short-term rentals after approving plan to regulate them

Councillors in Richmond, B.C., have voted to prohibit short-term rentals such as Airbnb, despite approving a plan less than a week earlier that would have regulated and legalized such services.

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

Councillors in Richmond, B.C., have voted to prohibit short-term rentals such as Airbnb, despite approving a plan less than a week earlier that would have regulated and legalized such services.

City council initially adopted a suite of regulations that would have licensed short-term rentals while only permitting them in an owner's primary residence. The proposed rules, which were set to go to public hearings, were intended to address complaints from neighbours while limiting the impact of such services on the long-term rental market.

But councillors voted unanimously on Monday to reverse course, instead prohibiting all short-term rentals aside from hotels, motels, B&Bs and other forms of accommodation that are already permitted. Councillors said they received a significant amount of negative feedback from the public.

Story continues below advertisement

"We are aware of the negative impacts on our community," Mayor Malcolm Brodie said in an interview Tuesday. "We are dedicated to take actions to persuade the residents that we want to solve the problem."

The vote this week means online booking websites such as Airbnb or Vacation Rentals By Owners will only be permitted to list locations with existing bed-and-breakfast licences from the city. Otherwise, council said the city should enforce its existing zoning and business bylaws to target short-term rentals.

Vancouver is expected to adopt its own regulations to regulate Airbnb this month, prohibiting entire units from being rented out and requiring business licences. Vancouver has suggested the service has taken hundreds or thousands of traditional rental units off the market. Other cities in British Columbia and elsewhere in Canada are also looking at the issue.

Airbnb, which accounts for 47 per cent of the short-term rentals in Richmond, said in a statement it is committed to working with municipal leaders across Canada to develop rules that support home sharing, but the statement did not directly respond to the decision by Richmond city council.

At the beginning of Monday's council meeting, eight people appeared before council to voice their concerns – all opposed to allowing short-term rentals.

Councillor Bill McNulty said he didn't support the proposal to legalize short-term rentals.

"We know people are complaining about this and people don't want this, then we should abandon this," Mr. McNulty told the council meeting.

Story continues below advertisement

He said short-term rentals have aggravated the affordable-housing situation in the city and he argued legalizing short-term rentals would make the problem worse.

"You can just give [short-term operators] a fine and they will continue to do that," he said.

Councillor Harold Steves, who was the only member of council to vote against the proposals last week, echoed those concerns during Monday's meeting.

He noted that according to a report presented to city council, there were approximately 300 entire houses or apartments listed on Airbnb.

"If we follow the staff's recommendation [to regulate short-term rentals], which means we will allow those to be legal hotels, that means the 300 houses are taken off the market for long-term rentals," he said.

Councillors asked city staff to prepare a report on the city's B&B licensing system. The new proposal to prohibit all short-term rentals will be sent for public consultation.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter