Skip to main content

Female faculty at McMaster University will be getting a raise after a two-year study showed differences in salary between the sexes at the Hamilton school.

The analysis found that women faculty members earned on average $3,515 less than their male counterparts in 2012 and 2013 – even after adjustments were made based on seniority, tenure, faculty and age.

"We should have been addressing this, but the issue has come to the fore, we've addressed it, done the analysis and are making the adjustment," said David Wilkinson, the university's provost and academic vice president.

Story continues below advertisement

The pay adjustment will be made on July 1.

Wilkinson said the study ran in parallel to an analysis by faculty member Charlotte Yates who released a report last year that focused on non-salary issues related to women's advancement and inclusion at the school.

"That will stand us in good stead in terms of recruiting better female faculty for the university and finding better ways to support them when they're here," Wilkinson said.

He said the university has begun implementing some of Yates's recommendations, which include merit pay evaluation for those on pregnancy or parental leave. While the university had a policy for evaluating faculty when they take a year off for research purposes, there was no such policy in place for those who took parental leave.

The report also recommended updating the harassment policy, ensuring equitable hiring practices, and leadership opportunities for women.

And, Wilkinson said, they are making a deliberate attempt to hire the same number of women as men, which is "close to 50 per cent now."

"This is a gradual change of culture and it's part of an ongoing process," Wilkinson said.

Story continues below advertisement

Yates said the harassment policy is being rewritten and the other recommendations are also being implemented.

She said she is proud of her employer for making the recent changes.

"It's a great thing and that the university is committed to equity and willing to put money on the table," Yates said.

Women across campus reached out to Yates on Tuesday, she said, and reaction was completely positive.

"It's been a little overwhelming – women feel positive about their current positions and hopeful for the future and potential leadership roles here," she said.

"I feel it's absolutely a wonderful thing we're moving forward and it signals to women faculty how serious the university is in creating an environment that recognizes them and their value to the school."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies