Skip to main content

‘This is petty and small-minded. We’re in the year 2014, not 1950,’ says drama teacher Jacqueline Laurent-Auger about her dismissal from Montreal’s Brebeuf College for nude appearances in erotic Parisian films in the 1960s and ’70s.

Bernard Brault/La Presse

Normally, a career as a movie actress wouldn't be a liability for a drama teacher. But a 73-year-old instructor at an elite Montreal private school has lost her job after it was discovered she appeared nude in several films in Europe more than 40 years ago.

In a sign of how the Internet can turn even one's distant past into grounds for dismissal, the prestigious Brébeuf College has terminated the contract of teacher Jacqueline Laurent-Auger after some male high-school students found some of her early acting repertoire online.

Ms. Laurent-Auger's early films, including such titles as Le journal intime d'une nymphomane (The Secret Diary of a Nymphomaniac), date to the 1960s and '70s when she was a struggling actress who had just graduated from theatre school in Montreal and moved to Paris.

Story continues below advertisement

"I did it as a young actress to make a little money," she said in an interview on Monday. "The idea of throwing someone out the door for something they did almost 50 years ago is idiotic. It makes me angry."

Her story has elicited widespread sympathy in Quebec since it first surfaced late last week. Meanwhile, the school – a Jesuit-founded institution that groomed leaders such as Pierre Trudeau and his son, Justin – has come under attack for a decision characterized as prudish and shortsighted. One blogger called it a case of "retroactive slut-shaming."

School director Michel April declined a request for an interview on Monday. However, in a statement released Sunday to quell the growing storm over the controversy, Brébeuf said it was acting in the students' best interests by ending Ms. Laurent-Auger's contract after 15 years.

"The fact that these films were shot 40 years ago doesn't change their bold and suggestive – even explicit – character," said the college. The Internet had brought the "erotic portion of [Ms. Laurent-Auger's] career into the present," and the students' discovery of their teacher's films affected the atmosphere in class, the school said.

"The availability on the Internet of erotic films in which she acted created an entirely new context that was not ideal for our students," the school said. "After discussion and reflection, we concluded that adult films must remain just that, a product for adults. That's why we decided not to renew Mrs. Laurent-Auger's contract."

Ms. Laurent-Auger stars in some of the films, which feature "erotic scenes," raising the question of whether the movies are "models to follow for high-school students becoming initiated into theatre and arts in general," the college said.

Ms. Laurent-Auger said when she was brought in to school offices to be told of her sacking in July, she asked if there was any problem with her teaching performance. She was told there was not.

Story continues below advertisement

"This is petty and small-minded," she said. "We're in the year 2014, not 1950."

She said the films in which she performed were not pornographic, but part of an artistic trend of openness in the film world in the 1960s and '70s. "I would never do pornography," she said. "We called them light, erotic films, and they have nothing to do with the kinds of things you see today."

The school was widely derided for its decision. In the Journal de Montréal, blogger Tania Longpré said many actors have some nude scenes in their repertoire, and they can't afford to refuse them on the chance that one day they might want to go into teaching; she said Brébeuf's decision hid "hypocritical puritanism."

Journal de Montréal columnist Lise Ravary said the school was acting to protect its "brand" as the most prestigious school in Quebec, and didn't want to be tarnished by a pornography-tainted "mini-scandal."

"When you're the Apple of private Quebec colleges in Quebec, you protect yourself," she wrote, adding that the school was more concerned about the value of its image than "the values of its students."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter