Skip to main content

Rene Gallant, president of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society, along with executive committee members, listens to presentations regarding Trinity Western University's proposed law school in Halifax on Thursday, Feb. 12, 2014.

Andrew Vaughan/THE CANADIAN PRESS

For the second time in two days, a provincial law society has refused to accredit a faith-based law school over concerns it would discriminate against gays and lesbians, dealing a jarring blow to Trinity Western University's plans.

The Nova Scotia Barristers' Society voted 10-9 on Friday to deny approval of the proposed law school unless the university would agree to drop a controversial policy barring same-sex intimacy. As Trinity Western, a private evangelical Christian school in Langley, B.C., has no plans to change its rules, the vote amounts to a refusal.

The decision came one day after the Law Society of Upper Canada, the country's largest law society, regulating 46,000 lawyers in Ontario, voted 28-21 against accrediting the proposed law school, effectively barring future graduates from practising in the province. The rulings threaten to splinter a national system for licensing lawyers that was only recently established.

Story continues below advertisement

After nearly four hours of passionate debate on Friday, Nova Scotia Barristers' Society president René Gallant told reporters Trinity Western has refused to budge on its controversial community covenant, a code of conduct all staff and students must sign that prohibits "sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman" – which many have decried as discriminatory.

"Now that they know our position they will have a decision to make," Mr. Gallant said.

Trinity Western president Bob Kuhn said the refusals "send the chilling message that you cannot hold religious values and also participate fully in public society."

The refusals from Ontario and Nova Scotia conflict with approvals already granted by law societies in B.C., Alberta and elsewhere, splintering the licensing process for lawyers and creating "a patchwork system in which TWU graduates can practise law in some provinces but not others," according to Trinity Western.

Canada recently sealed national mobility agreements that allow lawyers licensed in one province to practise across the country, but "this begins to stretch the fabric of mobility," said Don Thompson, executive director of the Law Society of Alberta.

Chase Arnesen, an openly gay Halifax lawyer who was raised a devout Mormon and attended a U.S.-based Christian university with a similar covenant, says that, "having lived in both worlds," Nova Scotia's ruling "is right."

"I think the decision sent a message that Nova Scotia will welcome and support all views, and that there's room for everyone," Mr. Arnesen said.

Story continues below advertisement

But Gavin Giles, a Halifax lawyer, spoke at length on Friday in favour of granting accreditation. He asked, rhetorically, why Nova Scotia would second-guess the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, a national body, which approved Trinity Western late last year.

"Because it feels good? Because we feel that it is a politically popular decision for us to make? … Because Ontario did it in a forum, I suggest, of nauseating bluster and inefficiency, or simply because we see our professional regulation differently?" he said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies