Skip to main content

A clear cut section of forest is seen on Grassy Narrows first nation territory near Dryden, Ont., in this 2006 handout image. Two first nations communities devastated by mercury poisoning nearly 50 years ago are still feeling the impacts from the metal toxins in one of their key water supplies, a world-renowned expert suggested.

HO/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Ontario's aboriginal affairs minister says he'll push for a review of a board that oversees compensation for First Nations residents suffering health issues from mercury poisoning.

David Zimmer says he'll work with the federal government and Wabaseemoong First Nation to get their approval to conduct a review to determine how best to help those with mercury-related health issues.

He says the proposed review of the Mercury Disability Board would look at the level of the current benefits provided by the board, which includes both the federal and provincial government.

Story continues below advertisement

Zimmer says the province would also look at options for more on-site treatment for Grassy Narrows First Nation residents.

Grassy Narrows Elder Steve Fobister says Zimmer's comments provide "some level of comfort," but more work needs to be done.

Water around Grassy Narrows has been contaminated with mercury since a local paper mill dumped an estimated 10 tonnes of neurotoxins into the system between 1962 and 1970.

The Grassy Narrows First Nation said Monday it had obtained an unreleased report that said the board's criteria to determine whether someone had symptoms consistent with mercury poisoning were based on science from the 1980s.

The report, which was commissioned by the board in 2009, also said there was "no doubt" people in the community near Kenora, Ont., suffered from mercury-related neurological disorders

The board was formed as part of an out-of-court settlement reached in the 1980s between Grassy Narrows and the Wabaseemoong Independent Nations and Ottawa, the province and two paper companies over mercury-related claims.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies