Skip to main content

/

Wesley VanDinter/Getty Images

A judge has refused to order a national judicial organization to reveal its training materials for sexual-assault law.

Edmonton lawyer Tom Engel had asked for the order, saying the National Judicial Institute's training may lead judges to be biased in favour of complainants and arguing that his client, Robert Harper, who is accused of sexual assault and other offences, may not be able to receive a fair trial. The judge-run group, whose board of governors is chaired by Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, refused to turn over its materials to him, calling them irrelevant to Mr. Harper's guilt or innocence.

Justice John Little of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench agreed with the NJI and did not ask its lawyers to present their arguments. After hearing from Mr. Engel, Justice Little dismissed the application. He said Mr. Engel had not proved that the materials were related to the assessment of the complainant's reliability and credibility, as he had hoped to show.

Story continues below advertisement

Adèle Kent, the NJI's executive director, applauded the ruling. "I think that this application shows that there is a false connection between education that judges may receive and bias in deciding a case," she said in an e-mail to The Globe and Mail.

"If that linkage is accepted, then everything a judge reads or studies outside of the courtroom could lead to the conclusion that he or she is biased. That cannot be the case, or we as a society would ask judges to remain isolated, not reading the newspaper, watching TV, engaging with their community and so on. In fact, the modern view is that judges need to be engaged and understand the people, the community, the society that they judge. In that context, judges are trained to decide cases on the evidence they hear in the courtroom and the law and to do that fairly and impartially."

Mr. Engel intends to argue that the complainant consumed drugs and attacked Mr. Harper and that her credibility will be a key issue at the trial. "I was in a bit of a catch-22 because I don't know what's in those educational materials," he said in an interview after Justice Little's ruling.

The complainant cannot be identified under federal law.

Mr. Engel's request came as a bill requiring candidates for the federal bench to receive training in sexual-assault law is being debated in the Senate. That bill, proposed by former interim Conservative Party leader Rona Ambrose, received all-party approval in the Commons.

It followed a public disciplinary hearing for a former Calgary judge who asked a sexual-assault complainant why she hadn't kept her knees together. That judge, Robin Camp, resigned from the Federal Court – to which he'd been moved from Alberta Provincial Court – after a committee of the Canadian Judicial Council recommended that Parliament dismiss him.

Robyn Doolittle explains the background of the Globe and Mail's Unfounded investigation into police handling of sexual assault allegations. The series won the international Data Journalism Awards for best investigation after spurring major shifts in public policy and new reviews from police services.
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter