Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Bribery allegations shake up PEI election campaign

Accusations of dirty politics and bribery surrounding a failed Prince Edward Island immigration program shook the province's election campaign at the midway point, but some say it won't change their votes on Oct. 3.

PEI voters interviewed before the only televised leaders' debate of the campaign say they are more preoccupied with bread-and-butter issues, such as jobs, help for the province's fishermen or the cleanup of Charlottetown's harbour.

Prudence Green of Kingston said the immigration program won't affect how she votes.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's getting kind of dirty," she said. "It's not nice."

Barry MacTavish of Eldon said controversy surrounding the immigration program isn't new.

"I'd made my mind up before that anyway because that's been ongoing now for a while," he said. "They'll get to the bottom of it sooner or later, I guess. There's not much we can do about it."

The program surfaced as an election issue after the federal Immigration Department forwarded accusations of bribery that were levelled by three former employees of the province to the RCMP and the Canada Border Services Agency. The Mounties are considering whether to proceed with an investigation after one worker alleged she saw senior provincial officials accept cash that she believes was intended to fast-track immigration applications from China.

Premier Robert Ghiz has denounced the accusations as unfounded and dismissed the timing of them as dirty politics.

The renewed controversy surrounding the program, which has already been investigated once by the RCMP and was the subject of an auditor general's report, has given Conservative Leader Olive Crane a weapon to battle the Liberals with.

Prof. Ian Dowbiggin of the University of Prince Edward Island says the new allegations provided the highlight of Thursday's debate on an issue Mr. Ghiz's Liberal government failed to adequately deal with when it first came up in 2008.

Story continues below advertisement

"They didn't put the story to bed," said Prof. Dowbiggin, who teaches history. "They had the auditor general do a report and the auditor general's findings were very critical, but the provincial government really just went on from there thinking the whole issue had been closed, but it keeps coming back."

If people see debate around the immigration program as dirty politics, Prof. Dowbiggin said it could cause some voters who aren't solidly aligned with a party to stay home on election day, which would help the Liberals in their bid for a second straight majority government.

"That may in fact encourage some swing voters simply to say, 'A pox on both their houses, I'm not voting in this election,' so that would serve the interests of the Liberals."

The immigration nominee program was a federal-provincial initiative in which the province nominated people for immigration to Canada in exchange for an investment of $200,000 in a local business. Immigrants were to pay a $25,000 deposit that would be returned after living in the province for one year.

Ms. Crane has kept the issue alive in the legislature for the past two years, but she took her most direct shot at the premier during the debate.

"You're a disgrace on the (immigration nominee) program and my government will restore integrity once again," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Prof. Dowbiggin said while the Conservatives may have gained some support as a result of the controversy surrounding the immigration program, he doesn't think it's enough to change the course of the election.

"I don't think it's going to catapult the Conservatives into government come election night, but it might affect a handful of close ridings and in that case it will prove to be a significant factor in a campaign that looked right from the beginning as if it could be a Liberal sweep," he said.

Report an error
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.