Skip to main content

Defence Minister Harjit Singh Sajjan speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Feb. 1, 2017.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Canada may have missed a chance to provide the commanding officer for the United Nations peacekeeping mission in Mali because it wanted to talk first to the Trump administration, the Canadian Press has learned.

The UN put out requests to a handful of top-tier countries in mid-December as the term of the mission's previous commander, Danish Maj.-Gen. Michael Lollesgaard, was coming to an end.

Sources say the Liberal government asked the UN to hold off on a decision until after the government had a chance to consult the new American administration on Canada's future peacekeeping plans.

Story continues below advertisement

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said last month he wanted to talk to his American counterpart, Defence Secretary James Mattis, before Canada sent peacekeepers to Africa because co-ordination with the U.S. is essential.

His office said Friday that Canada is still considering its options so it can make the best contribution possible to peace and security.

"We are going into this with our eyes open," said spokeswoman Jordan Owens.

"We will ensure that our troops have the right mission, mandate, training and equipment in order to mitigate risk and maximize our impact."

The UN force in Mali is still looking for a commander for its perilous mission holding the line in the fight against Islamic extremists in North Africa. The mission's deputy commander, a general from Senegal, is currently the highest-ranking officer.

Though the UN has made no formal announcement, it appears the Mali job has been filled and it won't be with a Canadian, said a western diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

"They had to get going," the diplomat said. "They haven't had a force commander there for over a month."

Story continues below advertisement

The UN and some of Canada's closest allies have expressed growing frustration, and even disappointment, at how long the Liberal government is taking to make a decision on where to send peacekeepers.

Canadian military officials have also expressed frustration in private as the Liberal government drags its feet on a decision.

Mali is considered the most dangerous UN peace support operation, a mission that defies the traditional label of peacekeeping.

More than 100 peacekeepers have been killed over the last four years — the majority by what the UN terms "malicious acts" — in a fight that began in April 2013, when France and African Union forces pushed back Islamist rebels that had taken control of the country's north.

With Denmark withdrawing its troops and commander at the end of December, there has been speculation that Canada would step in with some or all of the 600 troops the government committed last summer to UN operations.

Canada, considered a high-level NATO member, was one country that was approached to supply the mission's commander, sources say.

Story continues below advertisement

Sources say the new commander needed a particular expertise in intelligence, as well as a being French speaker.

"They really wanted a western country — a NATO member — who understands how you use intelligence in such a mission," the source said.

"They were going after a pretty short list of countries."

It wouldn't have been the first time a Canadian led a multi-national mission in Africa.

In 2011, now-retired general Charles Bouchard commanded the NATO air mission enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya to protect rebels fighting then-president Moammar Gadhafi.

In 1994, then-general Romeo Dallaire commanded the ill-fated and out-gunned UN peacekeeping mission that failed to prevent the Rwanda genocide.

Story continues below advertisement

The current UN mission to Mali includes about 13,000 troops and 2,000 police from Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and countries from Africa and South Asia.

Owens reiterated Friday that no decisions about deployments to other countries have been made.

Ukraine's envoy told The Canadian Press last month that his country is starting to question whether Canada will continue its future military support to his country to help it deter Russian aggression.

Canada's deployment to Ukraine of 200 troops in a non-combat mission is set to expire at the end of March. The government has yet to say whether Canada's contribution to that multi-national, non-UN mission will continue.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter