Skip to main content

Conservative leadership candidate Kellie Leitch speaks during the Conservative leadership debate in Saskatoon, Wednesday, November 9, 2016.

Liam Richards/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Federal Conservative Party leadership candidate Kellie Leitch says it is "ridiculous" to link her plan to screen immigrants for Canadian values with a deadly attack on a Quebec City mosque, arguing her proposal could equally be applied to white supremacists trying to enter the country.

Ms. Leitch was responding to criticisms from fellow leadership contenders and other party members who said her screening idea sows the type of hatred that could have inspired the Quebec City suspect, Alexandre Bissonnette, who is accused of murdering six Muslims during evening prayers on Sunday.

"This was an outrageous attack of violence," Ms. Leitch said in an interview Tuesday. "And there's no excuse, and no justification, for that type of act of terrorism."

Story continues below advertisement

Read more: Quebec City mosque attack suspect known as online troll inspired by French far-right

Opinion: Anti-Muslim hate has been in Canada - and our politics - long before the violence

Read more: Who's running for the Conservative leadership? Read the list of candidates

She said she is sticking by her proposal to screen immigrants for Canadian values such as freedom, tolerance, hard work and generosity. "What I'm talking about is simply having face-to-face interviews with trained immigration officers that would apply to everyone," she said.

Her remarks come as the world grapples with the fallout of U.S. President Donald Trump's controversial executive order barring immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim countries from entering the United States for three months. The order also means the U.S. will not accept refugees for 120 days and has suspended the arrival of refugees from war-torn Syria indefinitely.

Ms. Leitch said Mr. Trump's ban is not part of her plan. "What they will do I assume they will do in the best interest of their nation," she said.

Fellow leadership candidate Michael Chong on Tuesday accused Ms. Leitch of being a demagogue – someone who exploits prejudice for political gain. He said he believes there is a direct link between demagoguery around the world and the rise of hate crimes, particularly against Muslim communities in both Canada and the United States.

Story continues below advertisement

"I cannot stand idly by and let this kind of demagoguery, this kind of rhetoric that plays to fears and prejudices about immigrants and refugees continue unopposed," Mr. Chong told The Globe and Mail. "I think it's really important that people speak up, make their voices heard, to say that this is not the way forward."

He said Ms. Leitch's screening proposal is "dangerous" because the real threat of terrorism has been shown to be from native-born Canadians who have been radicalized on the Internet.

Another candidate in the race, Deepak Obhrai, said the Quebec attack is the result of the anti-immigrant stance promoted by politicians outside of Canada.

"This feeds into this fearmongering and manifests itself into what happened in Quebec City," he said.

NDP MP Peter Julian, a registered NDP leadership candidate, compared Ms. Leitch on Twitter to Mr. Trump. "I unequivocally condemn @KellieLeitch's #Trump-like hatred and bigotry. This has no place in Canada," he wrote.

Ms. Leitch said her screening test is not geared toward any specific region and isn't even specifically about security. She said it would apply "whether you're a white supremacist … or people who think women are pieces of property … or people who believe violence is a legitimate way to get what they want, who don't share our Canadian values."

Story continues below advertisement

When asked why she has never referenced white supremacists before, she said, "Well, do you think that Canadians share those values? I don't."

Ms. Leitch has been endorsed by white nationalists – including in an opinion piece published on the Council of European Canadians website, which believes "the European heritage and character of Canada should be maintained and enhanced," and British Columbia's anti-immigration Cultural Action Party.

She said she has condemned the endorsements. "I didn't accept their support," she said.

Asked whether there is a link between what she is proposing and the extremist groups, Ms. Leitch said: "I think you're stretching that."

Members of the mosque in Quebec City where a shooting took place say they are grateful to have support from so many people in the community.
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.