Skip to main content

How many Mom and Dad and the kids are there? And how many Mom and Dad and the kids from one marriage, the kids from the other marriage, and their own kids as well? How many Mom and Mom and the kids can be found across the land, or Dad and the kid, or Mom and Dad and the kids and the grandparents? And what is in between?

We'll know more on Wednesday, when Statistics Canada releases the 2011 census data on families.

Statscan has measured such exotic creations as "skip-generation families," "complex step families" and other alternatives to "the traditional, or what you might now call archaic" family – as Janice Keefe of Mount St. Vincent University in Halifax puts it – that make up the social fabric of contemporary Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

Previous census data have already shown that the number of married parents with children is in relative decline, common-law relationships are on the increase, single-parent families are ever more common and that couples increasingly include same-sex as well as opposite-sex relationships.

The question the census will answer is: How much is changing, and how fast? "We sense anecdotally" that family patterns are becoming increasingly complex, said Prof. Keefe, who teaches family studies and gerontology, "but we don't have a good handle on how that plays out."

The census will also provide Canadians with a better picture of when children leave home and how often they move back.

And it will look at families where adult couples live with parents or grandparents. One question that intrigues Prof. Keefe is how common that phenomenon is among immigrant families compared to the general population.

The new census data will offer the first glimpse of how many same-sex couples have embraced marriage since it became legal in 2005, and how many families have foster children.

The release will provide federal, provincial and municipal governments with hard data on whether and how programs and policies need to be rethought to accommodate the many variations on the traditional family.

Statistics Canada, of course, rigorously avoids making value judgments. It will be for each Canadian to decide whether the increasingly heterodox nature of our families is a sign of liberation or decline.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.