Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

It is so, so much worse than it needed to be.

Yes, the decisions before the last Ontario election to cancel a pair of gas-fired power plants in Oakville and Mississauga were indefensibly cynical, and horribly expensive. They were, in some measure, symbolic of the extent to which a government past its best-before date was willing to do anything to stay in power, including belatedly bowing to community pressure that it had previously dismissed as at odds with the greater good.

The fact is, though, that we would not still be talking so much about either decision if the governing Liberals had not lived up to the adage about the cover-up being worse than the crime – taking what could have been a relatively straightforward and not all that unusual case of a government spending its way out of political trouble, and turning it into a full-blown scandal.

Story continues below advertisement

The latest twist in this saga, as reported by Information and Privacy Commissioner Ann Cavoukian on Wednesday, is almost breathtaking for both the brazenness and the self-destructiveness involved.

It is difficult to decide which was more ill-advised: a chief of staff to the energy minister violating provincial law by indiscriminately deleting all the e-mails he sent and received, or a chief of staff to former premier Dalton McGuinty going to the head of the Ontario Public Service shortly before power was handed over to Kathleen Wynne, and inquiring as to how one might go about permanently deleting electronic records.

Presumably there was something worrisome in those records, even if staffers tend to avoid using their government e-mail accounts for sensitive exchanges. But whatever it was – evidence of political meddling in negotiations to get out of the power-plant contracts, or advice ignored, or big numbers the government didn't want out – it's difficult to imagine it was anything that would capture public attention as much as Liberals violating provincial law (albeit a rather toothless one) by putting potentially damaging documents through the metaphorical shredder.

The obfuscation on this file hasn't always been quite as shocking, and it has normally been somewhat more defensible. The Liberals can say they low-balled the cost of the two cancellations, now pegged at $310-million for Oakville and $275-million for Oakville, because they really didn't know where the number would wind up when the final bill was tallied. They can argue, plausibly, that they pushed back against a legislative committee's demand for related documents because they were wary of adversely affecting those negotiations. They can make a decent case that Mr. McGuinty's prorogation of the Legislature at the same time as his retirement announcement last fall was about more than just the heat from the brewing controversy.

But the bottom line is that at every turn the Liberals breathed new life into this mess, rather than just doing their best to come up with the real numbers as quickly as possible after the 2011, taking the hit – which, at that point, might have been partly shared by opposition parties that also wanted the plants to be scrapped – and moving on.

That they let it get away from them so badly owed partly to their inexperience with minority government. They didn't expect, for instance, that the legislative committee would make a somewhat mean-spirited move toward finding then-energy minister Chris Bentley in contempt when documents were slow to emerge. And such surprises seemed to make the Liberals, or some of them at least, behave more and more defensively.

It must also be chalked up to what prompted the power-plant about-faces in the first place. Under Mr. McGuinty, this was a government that was too much in survival mode to properly consider long-term ramifications. And when bad decisions started to catch up to it, it made more of them.

Story continues below advertisement

Still, there are Liberals who wonder why such a big deal has been made of it all. The answer is that they turned it into one.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies