Skip to main content

Politics Marc Garneau says Liberals won’t reconsider Billy Bishop expansion

A Porter flight descends to land at the Toronto Island Airport, as it flies past the Rogers Centre.

MARK BLINCH/REUTERS

The federal Liberals won't change a decision that effectively halts an expansion of the island airport in downtown Toronto, with the new transport minister calling it a "quality of life issue" for the city's residents.

Transport Minister Marc Garneau said Friday he intends to stick with a decision to reject a request from Porter Airlines to renegotiate an airport agreement among the City of Toronto, Ports Toronto and the federal government to extend the runway at Billy Bishop airport to allow jets to land.

The Liberals promised before and during the federal election not to open the three-party agreement.

Story continues below advertisement

Garneau said the promise was based on concerns from many voters in Toronto about what an airport expansion would mean for the future of the city's waterfront.

The decision made earlier this month goes beyond concerns about noise from larger planes landing at the island airport, he said.

"It's bigger than that," Garneau said in a telephone interview. "It's an issue that is an election promise and its main focus is on the fact that Torontonians want to have a greater say in the development of their waterfront."

Critics have asked the Liberals to reconsider the decision, pointing to the fact that the city and Ports Toronto are releasing assessments and feasibility studies early next year. Garneau said there was nothing that would make him reverse course on the decision.

"Not with respect to opening the tripartite agreement," he said. "Sometimes issues are quality of life issues and those are important."

Garneau first announced the decision on Twitter on Nov. 12. Opponents of the expansion celebrated the move, with one group holding a victory party last Monday with about 250 people, including Toronto Liberal MP Adam Vaughan.

NoJetsTO chairman Norman Di Pasquale said Garneau's comments Friday were the "nail in the coffin for the island airport expansion scheme."

Story continues below advertisement

"From the start, this has been a waterfront issue and we welcome the minister making this clear in his remarks," he said.

The Ontario Progressive Conservatives, the Opposition in the provincial legislature, have said the decision will hurt the local, provincial and national economies.

Ontario Tory MPP Monte McNaughton told Garneau in a letter sent a week ago that the airport expansion could result in $250 million a year in economic benefits to Toronto, based on a City of Toronto study and potentially 2,000 jobs at Porter Airlines and Bombardier.

McNaughton said there is too much economic potential for the federal Liberals to shut the door outright on expanding the airport.

"This is an important project for the country, for the province and for Toronto. The economic case for this speaks for itself," McNaughton said.

A spokesman for Porter said the airline had no comment on the matter at this time.

Story continues below advertisement

The decision could also be important to Bombardier and its CSeries plane.

In 2013, Porter placed an order worth US$870 million for a dozen of the 110- to 125-seat CSeries aircraft on the condition that they would be allowed to fly into the island airport. It also has options for 18 more aircraft that would raise the list price to US$2.15 billion if all options are exercised.

Montreal-based Bombardier has 603 purchase commitments, including 243 firm orders, for the plane, but hasn't secured an order in more than a year. The plane itself is more than two years late and US$2 billion over budget.

The Quebec government has agreed to give Bombardier US$1 billion to help complete development of the CSeries in exchange for a 49.5 per cent stake in the project.

The province and company are now looking to the federal government for extra help.

With files from Ross Marowits in Montreal

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter