Skip to main content

Defence Minister Jason Kenney speaks in the House of Commons on Feb. 17, 2015.

SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Defence Minister Jason Kenney is warning Canada faces a high probability of another attack from homegrown jihadists as he plays down the threat to civil liberties from proposed anti-terror legislation.

Mr. Kenney, who just assumed his new post weeks ago in a cabinet shuffle, made the dire prediction during an address to a defence conference in Ottawa Thursday morning.

The Harper government intends to pass Bill C-51, legislation that would expand the powers of security agencies, including the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, to fight terrorism. But Ottawa is not establishing greater civilian oversight of these agencies as opposition parties are recommending.

Story continues below advertisement

The government says the fact that authorities will have to seek judicial consent for many of the new powers is a sufficient protection.

Mr. Kenney said Canadians can't ignore the rising threat after the deadly attacks on soldiers last October as well as similar events in Paris, Sydney and Copenhagen.

He said Canadians are wrong to assume this country's geographical remoteness and its protection within the "American security umbrella" will spare them from the growing risk of radicalization at home. "Homegrown terrorism is not a remote concept but a Canadian reality," Mr. Kenney said.

"There is a high probability of jihadist attacks from within," the minister told the Conference of Defence Associations. "The threat of terrorism has never been greater. Combating them becomes more difficult as they merge, morph and migrate."

Talking to reporters after his speech, Mr. Kenney was asked why he feels the risk of homegrown terrorism would still be high even if C-51 passes. He said the risk would keep evolving.

"The threat that is going to keep mutating. We have to be flexibile in addressing the needs of our police and security agencies to counter the threat."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter