Skip to main content

Bob Chiarelli swears in as Minister of Energy of Ontario in the Legislative Chamber at Queen's Park in Toronto Feb. 11, 2013.

STRINGER/CANADA/REUTERS

The Ontario government will draw up new rules to make sure local residents have a say in where future power plants and other energy infrastructure is built, in a bid to avoid a repeat of the costly cancellation of two gas plants before the 2011 election.

In a letter to the Ontario Power Authority and the Independent Electricity System Operator, Energy Minister Bob Chiarelli ordered the two agencies Monday to prepare a report for him on what the new rules could look like. The report is due Aug. 1.

The directive comes just a day before former premier Dalton McGuinty is scheduled to testify before a legislative committee investigating the plant cancellations.

Story continues below advertisement

The committee has already heard that Mr. McGuinty made the decision to cancel the plants, in Oakville and Mississauga. In the case of the Mississauga project, Mr. McGuinty is said to have even overruled his own energy minister in deciding the plant had to go.

The cancellations, which cost an estimated $585-million, were widely seen as a ploy to win area seats.

Premier Kathleen Wynne has said that the problem was with the fact that the Liberal government allowed the plants to be located in communities that did not want them in the first place.

"I very much regret that we're in this situation and I take responsibility for providing all the information and making sure that, more importantly, making sure that, as we go forward, this doesn't happen again," she said Monday.

In his letter, Mr. Chiarelli told OPA and IESO to recommend a process for the government to consult with municipalities, aboriginal groups and others on regional energy plans and on the locations of new power plants. The recommendations must also reflect the findings of the legislative committee probing the gas plant cancellations, Mr. Chiarelli wrote.

"I encourage you to engage and involve any stakeholders necessary for ensuring that the recommendations you develop will achieve the objectives outlined above," he wrote.

The agencies' report will also suggest a more detailed process for energy planning in future.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter