Skip to main content

Construction continues on the major transformation of the train shed area of Toronto's Union Station on Oct. 9, 2013. Ontario is banking on changes to the way it awards construction contracts to make it harder for companies from outside the province to win government work, while forcing builders to help expand the work force.

MOE DOIRON/The Globe and Mail

Ontario is banking on changes to the way it awards construction contracts to make it harder for companies from outside the province to win government work, while forcing builders to help expand the work force.

Government and industry insiders concede that a new "local knowledge" requirement is effectively a way of giving the edge to domestic bidders without violating international trade agreements. Now, sources told The Globe and Mail, Kathleen Wynne's Liberals are working with the provincial agency Infrastructure Ontario to beef up that requirement – which was quietly introduced by former premier Dalton McGuinty shortly before he left office – and build off it with other conditions.

The additional measures, likely to be signalled in the government's Nov. 7 Fall Economic Statement and in a speech Ms. Wynne will deliver the same day to a conference on public-private partnerships, could include forcing larger companies that win major contracts to share a piece of the action with smaller ones, and demanding increased commitments to apprenticeships aimed at addressing youth unemployment.

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberals are hoping that the changes will help them present tens of billions of dollars in coming transportation projects, including a crosstown light-rail transit line in Toronto for which the procurement process is currently under way, as part of their job-creation agenda. Some sources suggest they're also seeking favour with trade unions, which tend to have better relationships with domestic companies than foreign ones.

Government officials are confident that "local knowledge" will be exempt from any limitations on provinces' ability to favour their own companies imposed by the new Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the European Union.

The government is still grappling, however, with concerns that moving too aggressively could drive up costs, because the changes could represent a significant shift in Infrastructure Ontario's operating model.

Established by Mr. McGuinty in 2006, the agency has received generally positive reviews for managing public-private partnerships with a focus on value for money, rather than other policy or political goals.

In recent years, that approach led to controversial decisions to award projects to foreign bidders, including for Hamilton's football stadium and Windsor's $1.4-billion parkway. The latter particularly rankled the province's construction sector, which has complained that the consortium, led by Spain's Tierra Armada S.A., hasn't met safety standards.

Under pressure from the Ontario General Contractors Association and organized-labour allies, Mr. McGuinty brought "local knowledge" into the process at the end of 2012. Bidders are now required to provide "narratives" about experience meeting those standards, navigating permit processes with municipalities and working with the province's labour force and suppliers. Those considerations are then cumulatively given 10-per-cent weight during requests for quotation (RFQs), the procurement stage that narrows competition down to a few finalists.

With the roughly $5-billion Toronto LRT line currently in the RFQ stage and held up as a test case, Ms. Wynne is now looking for ways to bolster the new criterion. Those could include making "local knowledge" a factor not just in RFQs but also in Requests for Proposals (RFPs), in which Infrastructure Ontario chooses from among the finalists. It is also possible that it could be made to count for more than 10 per cent in RFQs, RFPs or both.

Story continues below advertisement

The government also appears to be responding to criticism that "bundling" large quantities of work on the LRT and other projects into one procurement process prevents smaller Ontario companies from competing. Future projects could be broken up into multiple contracts, or winning bidders required to subcontract a minimum share of the work.

Meanwhile, the Liberals intend to seek new apprenticeship commitments, either by taking into account such plans when bids are being considered or by requiring whichever company gets the contract to allot a certain number of spaces.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies