Skip to main content

John Clark and Michelle Rhodes relax in their Toronto townhouse on Sunday, September 18, 2012. Once upon a time, a declaration of lifelong love and commitment could be boiled down to two simple words: "I do." Numbers from the 2011 census suggest a pairing of a different sort: "Why bother?"

Patrick Dell/The Canadian Press

Another wave of 2011 census data has been released, showing the changing face of Canadian families. We've got an in-depth story and an analysis from John Ibbitson, but here are the highlights:

Marriage in decline

The dominant family structure in 2011 was married couples, but they continue to decrease as a share of all families. From 2001 to 2011, married couples dropped from 70 per cent to 67 per cent of all families.

Story continues below advertisement

Common-law on the rise

For the first time in 2011, the number of common-law couples surpassed the number of single-parent families. Between 2006 and 2011, the number of common-law couples rose nearly 14 per cent, more than four times the 3-per-cent increase for married couples.

Smaller families

Canadian families have become smaller over time. The average number of children per family decreased from 2.7 in 1961 to 1.9 in 2011. During the same period, the average number of people per family declined from 3.9 to 2.9.

The boomerang effect

42 per cent of young adults aged 20 to 29 lived in the parental home either because they never left it or because they returned home from elsewhere. The proportion changed little from 2006, but much higher than in previous decades: 32 per cent in 1991 and 26 per cent in 1981.

More people living alone

Story continues below advertisement

For the first time, there were more one-person households than couple households with children. Between 2001 and 2011 , the proportion of one-person households increased from 25 per cent to more than 27 per cent of all households.

Multiple-family households

The proportion of multiple-family households has edged up slightly over the last decade. Nunavut had the largest share, but they were also prevalent in fast-growing municipalities such as Brampton and Surrey.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter