Skip to main content

Britain's Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge is presented with a bouquet of flowers by Jamie Andrew, age seven, during a visit to the City Hospital in Peterborough in central England November 28, 2012.

Reuters

The federal government tabled a bill on Thursday to accept changes to the rules on royal succession, part of a bid to end the practice of favouring sons over daughters as heirs to the throne.

If passed, the bill would provide assent to changes already proposed by the United Kingdom. Britain introduced legislation last month seeking to end the practice of putting a male heir ahead of his elder sister in the line of succession and to allow any heir to marry a Roman Catholic without becoming ineligible for the throne.

Heritage Minister James Moore called the British reforms "common sense" and "principled" changes that would help keep the Crown relevant.

Story continues below advertisement

The rules governing succession have come up for debate in the past, but the recent marriage of Prince William and Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge – and their announcement that the duchess, formerly Kate Middleton, is pregnant – brought the issue to the fore again.

"What this means is that if the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's first child is a girl, she will be heir to the throne and she will be able to marry someone of any faith," Mr. Moore said. "The legislation will ensure that the Crown remains an institution that can evolve to reflect 21st-century values."

The British proposal was discussed at a Commonwealth meeting in October, 2011, where all members indicated that they agreed in principle with the changes. The Conservative government did not consult with the provinces before tabling the bill, Mr. Moore said, adding there was no need to do so because the legislative change does not require an amendment to Canada's Constitution.

The 1982 Constitution Act indicates that the Senate, House of Commons and the legislative assemblies of each province must authorize any changes to the office of the Queen, the Governor-General and the lieutenant-governor of a province. But a government official said the Conservative bill should have no bearing on the "office of the Queen" because it doesn't affect her powers, duties or functions in Canada.

Mr. Moore said he is not aware of any opposition to the proposed changes from the provinces. "They're free to speak," he said. "In over a year none of them have spoken."

Daniel Paillé, leader of the Bloc Québécois, said he wants the federal government to consult with Quebec and other provinces on the bill. "We're not sure if it's a modification [of the Constitution] or not," he said. "… but at least they have to consult the province." He added that, while he considers the monarchy to be an outdated institution, he has no problem with the substance of the bill.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies