Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Ontario Tory House leader, Jim Wilson, centre, refuses to drop a contempt motion against the Liberals that will be passed when legislation resumes on Sept. 9, 2013 because the justice committee was not allowed to ask about emails showing senior Liberals talked about getting Speaker Dave Levac to change a preliminary finding of contempt against the government in the gas plants scandal.

Peter Power/The Globe and Mail

Ontario's Opposition is threatening to file a second contempt motion against the Liberal government even if a justice committee is allowed to look into the so-called "Liberal plot" to influence the Speaker of the legislature.

"I don't see any reason at this point to drop the contempt motion," Progressive Conservative house leader Jim Wilson said in an interview Thursday.

The Tories will file the motion Sept. 9, the day the legislature resumes, because the justice committee was not allowed to ask about e-mails showing senior Liberals talked about getting Speaker Dave Levac to change a preliminary finding of contempt against the government.

Story continues below advertisement

Premier Kathleen Wynne expressed "surprise" that the questions had been ruled out of order, but wouldn't commit to agreeing to broaden the mandate of the justice committee and said it would be up to the three party house leaders to resolve the issue.

"I had fully expected that those questions could be asked," Ms. Wynne told reporters.

"We've been as open as possible in terms of providing information, tens of thousands of documents have been provided to the committee, and the house leaders will need to talk about this next piece."

Mr. Wilson said Ms. Wynne knew questions about the e-mails regarding the Speaker would be blocked at the committee, which is holding hearings into the Liberals' decisions to cancel gas plants in Oakville and Mississauga at a cost of at least $585-million.

"I don't think she's telling the whole truth," he said. "She would have known it was coming, and she's acting as if it's a surprise today."

The New Democrats said Ms. Wynne should simply have agreed the Liberals would move a motion in the legislature to expand the justice committee's mandate to allow the questions about attempts to pressure the Speaker.

"All the premier had to do today is say, 'yes, I will tell my house leader to expand the scope of the committee,' and that would be the end of it," said NDP House Leader Gilles Bisson.

Story continues below advertisement

Recently released e-mails show unelected Liberals in former premier Dalton McGuinty's office planned to put the Speaker "on notice" about his preliminary finding last fall that then-energy minister Chris Bentley was in contempt of the legislature.

One Liberal operative was sent to meet with Mr. Levac, but the Speaker never changed his ruling that there was a "prima facie" case of contempt against Mr. Bentley for not releasing documents on the cancelled gas plants as requested by a committee.

Debates on contempt motions preempt all other business at the legislature, including the work of committees, but Mr. Wilson said the Tories will push ahead even if the committee is given permission to ask questions about the attempts to pressure Mr. Levac.

"We'll still pursue the contempt, but what may happen is the Speaker may say 'look, you've already got the committee's mandate expanded, I'm not going to do another separate inquiry as you ask,"' said Mr. Wilson. "That may be what he rules, but I don't see any reason at this point to drop the contempt (motion)."

The often nasty debate on the original contempt motion was one of the reasons cited by Mr. McGuinty when he prorogued the legislature and announced his resignation last October, delaying the hearings into the gas plants until Ms. Wynne was picked as his successor.

Ms. Wynne said she would not follow Mr. McGuinty's lead and prorogue the legislature to avoid another heated contempt debate, nor would the minority government trigger a snap election.

Story continues below advertisement

"I'm not in any way planning for a fall election," she said. "We have a lot of work to do and we're going to get at it."

The opposition parties say the Liberals cancelled the two gas plants to save seats in the 2011 election, when they were reduced to a minority government, and deliberately tried to cover up the true cost of their decisions.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies