Skip to main content

A rifle owner checks the sight of his rifle at a hunting camp property in rural Ontario west of Ottawa on Wednesday Sept. 15, 2010. The House of Commons is set to vote on the long-gun registry next week.

Sean Kilpatrick/Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Quebec is considering the idea of having its own long-gun registry if the federal government scraps the current version.

Public Security Minister Robert Dutil told The Canadian Press that civil servants are considering a so-called "plan B" - a provincial registry - if the Conservatives deliver on their promise to ditch the federal one.

"Certainly the people in the department have been told to look at all possibilities and to see how we could react to any number of circumstances," Mr. Dutil said in an interview.

Story continues below advertisement

But the priority remains convincing the Tories that the registry should be kept alive, Mr. Dutil said. Keeping the pressure on Ottawa is a task that lies with Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Pierre Moreau.

The federal government reiterated in its throne speech last month that it wants to kill the 16-year-old registry.

"For the moment, there is still a [federal]law, no bill has been tabled, so we haven't seen the contents," Mr. Dutil said. "But we think we have good arguments for keeping the long-gun registry."

The Quebec government has long supported the registry. During the 2008 federal election campaign, Premier Jean Charest urged the parties to maintain it and reinforce gun-control regulations.

Quebeckers have been solidly behind the registry, which was introduced by the federal Liberals in 1995. Mr. Dutil said the Quebec government's position hasn't changed.

But what has changed is the balance of power in Ottawa.

Last September, with a Conservative minority government in power, MPs voted 153 to 151 against a private member's bill aimed at axing the registry.

Story continues below advertisement

A Conservative majority would have no problem eliminating it.

"It's a big change and we have to be realistic and consider this possibility," Mr. Dutil said.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said during the recent federal election campaign that the money spent to keep the registry running is unjustified and that it punishes law-abiding gun owners.

The Conservatives argue the database carries incomplete and unreliable information.

But supporters counter that it is an essential tool for law enforcement and contend that it saves lives.

Mr. Dutil said several questions must be considered: Does the registry have a positive effect on reducing crime? Reducing suicides? Do police use the registry? Is the registry used in solving a wide range of crimes?

Story continues below advertisement

"The answers are yes," he said.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.