Skip to main content

TTC Chair Karen Stintz speaks during City council debate of the OneCity transit plan in Toronto, Ont. on July 11, 2012.

Peter Power/The Globe and Mail

In a serious blow to TTC chair Karen Stintz and her allies, Toronto city council has killed the OneCity transit plan by reducing it from a 30-year, $30-billion vision to a footnote in a future study and a pledge to hold public consultations on a city-wide transit strategy in the fall.

Ms. Stintz and TTC vice-chair Glenn De Baeremaeker couldn't even muster enough votes to put on the floor a motion to study converting the Scarborough RT into a subway instead of a light-rail line.

Making that Scarborough subway a priority was the only major element of the OneCity proposal that Ms. Stintz hadn't agreed to drop before the meeting because she couldn't amass enough votes for a study of her bold, original pitch.

Story continues below advertisement

In the end, council voted 43-1 in favour of a motion that confirmed studies already under way and asked that Torontonians have input on a long-term plan, including how to pay for it.

Ms. Stintz painted that as a successful step toward a funded transit blueprint tied to the city's official plan.

"I feel very confident that city council will step up to the plate, they will fund the plan and, for the first time, city council will have its own transit plan that can be relied upon to survive election cycles," she said after the vote.

Councillor Doug Ford, the mayor's brother, had a different take.

"The OneCity plan went down in flames ... I can assure everyone in Toronto the mayor's back in charge of transit and we're going to move forward."

Mayor Rob Ford declined to comment and didn't speak during the afternoon-long debate on the matter.

Councillor Shelley Carroll called the outcome a "face-saving" move, while Peter Milczyn, the TTC commissioner who moved the motion, put it more bluntly.

Story continues below advertisement

"OneCity never happened," he said. "It was a press conference."

Widespread fanfare greeted OneCity when Ms. Stintz and Mr. De Baeremaeker unveiled it on June 27.

They proposed using a special property-tax increase that would work out to a 1.9-per-cent increase per year – levelling off after four years and continuing at that rate for three decades – to pay for 170 kilometres of new subway, light-rail, streetcar and bus lines.

Although Ms. Stintz was only asking for a study of the OneCity concept, it didn't take long for opposition to mount.

The mayor slammed the property-tax element, left-leaning councillors lined up against the overall plan, and the provincial government said it was too late for city council to change its mind about the replacement for the deteriorating Scarborough RT, a project Queen's Park is bankrolling.

"I am disappointed that we missed an opportunity, I believe, to build the subway extension through Kennedy [station] to Sheppard [Avenue], but the will of council is supreme," Ms. Stintz said on the floor.

Story continues below advertisement

As part of the battle between subway and LRT earlier this year, city council voted in February to confirm the RT replacement as an above-ground light-rail line.

OneCity advocated reversing that decision and asking the municipal government to pay nearly $500-million to bury the line.

But with $41-million in design work completed and light-rail cars already ordered, council voted 26-14 to uphold Speaker Frances Nunziata's ruling that changing the plan was out of order.

Council did agree to make a light rail line along the eastern waterfront a priority.

Councillor Paula Fletcher, who voted to debate the Scarborough subway line, said she is disappointed council did not have a chance to discuss the issue.

"In the debates earlier this year, all attention was focused on the Eglinton and Sheppard lines and no attention was given to what will happen to TTC service in Scarborough when the aging rapid transit line is replaced," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Replacing the line with light-rail will mean shutting it down for four years. At current ridership, it will take 160 buses an hour to maintain service, she said, while a subway could be built while the existing line continues to run.

Those facts were never on the table during the debate about choosing subways or light-rail, she added.

"Hindsight is 20-20," she said.

Councillor Adam Vaughan said the problem with the OneCity proposal was that it was announced without consulting staff or the public.

"They've fallen into a trap that Rob Ford set" of big announcements and slogans, he said.

Councillor Maria Augimeri, another TTC commissioner, said Ms. Stintz and Mr. De Baeremaeker should be praised for their "courage" in promoting a plan to pay for desperately needed public-transit expansion in Toronto.

Story continues below advertisement

"I think we ought to applaud them for that," she said.

Ms. Stintz said she believed the motion passed on Wednesday would get things moving.

"We don't want to be the city that talks about transit any more. We want to be the city that builds transit," she said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies