Skip to main content

City of Toronto ombudsman Fiona Crean chats with Karen Stintz during an afternoon session of city council on Oct 4 2012. The Toronto ombudsman had earlier presented a report investigating the administration of the appointments of the public appointments process.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Toronto council has decided to extend the ombudsman's contract for two years instead of five, a "compromise" that had some of the mayor's foes praising him for demonstrating a rare willingness to bend.

Ombudsman Fiona Crean's job hung in the balance for much of the day Tuesday as councillors scurried around the chamber trying to cut a deal that would keep Mayor Rob Ford and his allies from blocking her reappointment.

"I just want to make sure that we're all in this together," Mr. Ford told his colleagues before the vote. "If we're not, it'll be unfortunate because I am compromising, I am reaching out."

Story continues below advertisement

Council supported the mayor's motion by a wide margin, 41-3.

Ms. Crean has been in the mayor's sights for weeks, ever since she released a report that concluded his office meddled in the recruitment and appointment of citizens to city boards.

The mayor also suggested abolishing her office – along with those of two other watchdogs – and replacing them with a single lawyer on retainer.

By a fluke of timing, council had to decide Tuesday whether to extend Ms. Crean's contract, which was set to expire in November 2013.

Complicating matters further, a two-thirds super-majority was required to hand Ms. Crean another five-year term.

That meant the mayor, whose grip on the 45-member council is usually weak at best, needed only 15 votes to block her reappointment.

When it became clear that Mr. Ford likely had the votes, a few members of his camp and some of his staunchest left-leaning opponents began hammering out a compromise, one that could extend Ms. Crean's term and keep Mr. Ford from looking like a mayor out for political revenge.

Story continues below advertisement

The mayor even thanked some by name in his speech. "I think this is a fair compromise. It should carry," he said. "I want to thank, obviously, on our side, Councillor [Peter] Milczyn and Councillor [Karen] Stintz, on the other side, Councillor [Pam] McConnell, Councillor [Paula] Fletcher."

Ms. Fletcher, usually a foe of the mayor, later told reporters she wrote the compromise motion the mayor moved. Mr. Milczyn said he got involved toward the end, suggesting the two-year figure council ultimately endorsed.

TTC Chair Karen Stintz, a key broker, paced the chamber flashing two fingers – for a two-year deal – as the compromise came together.

Councillor Doug Ford said the outcome showed his brother is "maturing as mayor."

But Councillor Adam Vaughan, the mayor's most outspoken critic, dismissed the compromise storyline.

"The mayor wanted [Ms. Crean] gone. She's still here. That's a win [for us,]" he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Crean, meanwhile, spent much of the day in the public gallery talking to councillors and watching the diplomacy unfold.

"I'm delighted they've extended the term. I'm disappointed it's not five years as the legislation calls for," Ms. Crean said in an interview.

However, she said the debate was not good for an office that exists to help ordinary Torontonians fight city hall.

"The uncertainty that kind of debate provokes is unhealthy," she said.

Councillor Gord Perks, one of the three who voted against the deal, slammed the arrangement.

"This city council has sent a message to public servants that their job is contingent on whether or not the mayor likes what they have to say. That's terrible for Toronto and Torontonians."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter