Skip to main content

The University of Toronto, McGill University, McMaster University and the University of Victoria among others scored As across all research areas in U-Multirank’s study.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Global university rankings are turning into a reputational arms race this fall – one that shows Canadian universities are holding their own against the best of international competitors, but also raises questions about how students and families can sort through the different standards to find the school that is right for them.

On Wednesday, upstart ranking body U-Multirank – a European Union-funded non-profit that gives universities grades but does not rank them – released its ratings of university research strength by the age of the school. It found that younger universities produce less research, but that the reason they do so is because they focus on other goals, particularly accessibility.

"Many universities were founded post-1945 and they account for a large percentage of the world's higher-education institutions," said Frans van Vught, a project leader for U-Multirank. "They were not necessarily created with the intention of ever becoming international centres of research excellence. Instead, they gave more people from a wider variety of backgrounds the opportunity to study."

Story continues below advertisement

The results also confirm what other tables released this fall have shown: In spite of flat or declining funding for postsecondary institutions in Canada and increasing funding to universities in Asia and some European countries, this country's institutions are up for the competition.

Last month, for example, the University of Toronto came in third in a closely watched research ranking produced by National Taiwan University (NTU) that looks at the number of research papers produced by faculty and how frequently they are cited in other work. The top two spots were won by Harvard and Johns Hopkins.

In Wednesday's U-Multirank study, U of T also scored As across all of the research areas, as did McGill University, McMaster University and the University of Victoria, among others.

"We've moved up from the fourth spot last year and were strong along all the six areas in the NTU," said Cheryl Regehr, the vice-president and provost at U of T.

The annual fall rankings season coincides with the rush to submit university applications. The name recognition offered by having a spot in the league tables plays a huge part in how students from abroad decide which school they would like to attend, and in research collaborations.

"Students know that the degree will be recognized anywhere because of the name recognition of the University of Toronto," Dr. Regehr said.

So important is showing up in a ranking that some smaller universities are now paying more than $15,000 annually for "QS Stars," an analysis of their teaching, infrastructure and internationalization strategies by the same company that puts out the QS Rankings, one of the big global ranking systems.

Story continues below advertisement

Ironically, it is smaller universities that may benefit the most from the proliferation of ranking systems.

While top universities are caught in a virtuous cycle where their established reputation leads to recruitment of renowned faculty, top students and generous donations, smaller universities can go unrecognized. In the latest U-Multirank ratings, the University of Guelph and the University of Manitoba both receive As in research output for their age and size, for example.

"Each of the rankings has a slightly different focus; some rely on reputation more," Dr. Regehr said. "That's why it's important to look for consistency across the rankings."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter